ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: coffeenow
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于万年必考的代词指代问题

[复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-20 00:01:00 | 只看该作者

There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our heavy reliance on fossil fuels: more than ten times as much
            energy is generated through wind power now than it was in 1990.

(A) generated through wind power now than it was

(B) generated through wind power now as it was

(C) generated through wind power now as was the case
            

(D) now generated through wind power as it was

(E) now generated through wind power than was the case

不选B的原因就是指代错误:

B.
                            It
精确指代现在通过风能产生的电力,这个电力不可能再出现在1990年,故用it造成了该选项逻辑含义不合理。
                        

不好意思我看错选项了,我以为B是generated through wind power now as that was .晕菜~~~

12#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-20 00:02:00 | 只看该作者
MM.你也快考了吧,感觉你很高手呢
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-20 00:13:00 | 只看该作者

关于美国人民梦想的题目,我开始也是以为是LIKE 和AS 的问题来着,研究了半天,后来才发现是比较对象的不同.LIke和AS我也一直有这样的疑问,因为一般Like都是置于句首,表示主语的比较,在句尾做宾语比较的确实比较少.

不过OG12做了一遍,发现ETS又有新的鬼主意了,老美大概觉得Like和As太简单了.现在喜欢考Whereas表示的对比了.

OG12有两道题都是考察这个词语的.

14#
发表于 2009-9-20 12:08:00 | 只看该作者

因为我语法看得比较多...呵呵

恩,我没有做og12,因为我发现新增的题目基本上都是GWD的,或者新prep的...

不过我普遍觉得og12比较难,都和gwd有些题是一个档次了

好像更注重逻辑了,要看懂句意了,原来听XDF网络课堂,人家都不带看句意了的...

whereas用法比较广泛,没有like,as那么多限制,呵呵,

15#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-20 14:39:00 | 只看该作者

抛砖引玉贴点关于(while/whereas/where)三个连词引导比较状语从句的规则,大家多多指正啊,感觉这会是今后的考点呢 

 

While 在句首引导壮语从句表示转折含义,在英语中有三个类似的词表示转折含义:while/where/whereas 三者的区别在于where 只能放在句首作状语表示转折含义,不能方在主句后的从句前面,因为where可能做定语,从而使修饰对象产生混淆, while/whereas可放在句首,也可放在主句后的从句前面,逗引导状语从句表示转折. While(whereas)一般不引导时间状语从句,而是表示前后的强烈对比,并且要注意前后的搭配(一致),包括单复数和时态.while + 动词现在分词, 与主句动作做强烈对比

16#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-20 14:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用没办法1987在2009/9/20 12:08:00的发言:

因为我语法看得比较多...呵呵

恩,我没有做og12,因为我发现新增的题目基本上都是GWD的,或者新prep的...

不过我普遍觉得og12比较难,都和gwd有些题是一个档次了

好像更注重逻辑了,要看懂句意了,原来听XDF网络课堂,人家都不带看句意了的...

whereas用法比较广泛,没有like,as那么多限制,呵呵,

我是读了XDF的,不过感觉XDF的语法点大多都过时了,譬如上课的时候一直腔调,that 直接跟在名词后引导限制性定从,Which与所修饰的名词之间要加逗号,引导非限制性定从,但是OG12明确指出,限制和非限制不是这么划分的,跟谁引导没关系.

总之不能说完全没用,但是适应性已经不是很广了,在时间不够的情况下,按照XDF原则猜答案倒是有可能提高正确率的.

17#
发表于 2009-9-20 23:04:00 | 只看该作者

MM实在厉害啊,受益良多啊。

刚刚问了个比较厉害的朋友,觉得分析起来比较容易:

According to a recent poll, owning & living in a freestanding house on its own land (X) is still a goal of a majority of young adults as it was of earlier generations.

句子的结构就是 X is a goal of..., as it was (the goal) of ...., 前面是系表结构,所以后面也用系表结构平行,而且结构对称,非常符合GMAT的语法要求。

这里的it 精确指代X (owning & living in a freestanding house on its own land), 由于是同名同物所以要用it, 而that 经常是用于同名不同物的情况下,所以 like that of earlier generations 就不太好了。

18#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-21 09:51:00 | 只看该作者

 在做PREP语法笔记的时候碰到了很多以前没碰到的语法点.

17. The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including there wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old.

A. merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including

C. as mere meat scavengers, has emerged from examining tools found in Germany that includes

D. mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, which includes

E. mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including

笔记中说 V+from+-ing分词或名词,这也有表示过程和结果的区别? 这个不是固定搭配么? 那么譬如说prevent from doing,这个词组是不是也有表状态还是表结果的区别呢?纠结-ing

11. Before scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly in small amounts from the pituitary glands of human cadavers.

A. scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly

B. scientists had learned about making a synthetic growth hormone, they had to remove it painstakingly

C. scientist learned how to synthesize the growth hormone, it had to be painstakingly removed

D. learning how to make a synthetic growth hormone, scientists had to remove it painstakingly

E. Learning how to synthesize the growth hormone, it have to be painstakingly removed by scientists

这道题我选了D,但是笔记中解释说,learn的主语scientists 和 remove 的主语scientists,不是一拨人,可是scientists 本来就是泛指啊 ? 哪位高手来帮帮忙吧.

19#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-21 10:23:00 | 只看该作者

没办法MM,关于形容词短语/分词短语/介词短语/插入语的修饰问题,我总结了一下,你看对不对啊

形容词短语(除contrary to )/分词短语/介词短语,如果置于句首,做状语,修饰主句主语

contrary to 和名词性短语无逻辑主语.

形容词短语/-ED分词短语/介词短语/插入语 置于句中或句末,一般做定语.就近修饰离它最近的名词.

-ING分词短语,表伴随动作,修饰主句主语

             表伴随结果,无逻辑主语.

20#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-21 12:42:00 | 只看该作者

11  Before scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly in small amounts from the pituitary glands of human cadavers.

A. scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly

B. scientists had learned about making a synthetic growth hormone, they had to remove it painstakingly

C. scientist learned how to synthesize the growth hormone, it had to be painstakingly removed

D. learning how to make a synthetic growth hormone, scientists had to remove it painstakingly

E. Learning how to synthesize the growth hormone, it have to be painstakingly removed by scientists

OA: C

没办法MM,语法笔记第11题如上,似乎和我们上次谈到的主从句中的代词指代也有出入啊.

答案选C,但是C中主句主语it ,是不是应该优先指代从句的主语scientist啊,并且从句中还有一个单数名词hormene, 我觉得这是有歧义的.

笔记解释说D选项的错误在于, 主句中learn的主语和从句中remove的主语scientists不是一拨人,但是scientists本来就是泛指吧,这也不表明是一拨人啊.奇怪的很~~~~~~~~~~赐教一下吧

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-3 03:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部