ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines have been priced to sell, and they are.

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 8826|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-SC87

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-9 19:18:00 | 只看该作者

OG12-SC87

In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners
have cut prices; their wines have been priced to sell,
and they are.
(A) have been priced to sell, and they are
(B) are priced to sell, and they have
(C) are priced to sell, and they do
(D) are being priced to sell, and have
(E) had been priced to sell, and they have
Verb form
In the underlined segment, the second verb does
not need to repeat the word sell because it is
understood from the previous verb phrase priced to
sell. However, the second verb must be correctly
conjugated with the understood sell. Th ey are sell is
not a correct verb form; they do sell is correct.
A Th ey are would require selling to complete it,
not sell.
B Th ey have would require sold to complete it,
not sell.
C Correct. Th is sentence properly uses they do
in place of they do sell, a grammatically
correct verb.
D Have would require sold to complete it, not
sell; omitting the subject they requires that
the comma be omitted as well.
E Th ey have would require sold to complete it,
not sell; the past-perfect had been priced
suggests illogically that the wines were
already priced to sell before the vintners cut
prices; moreover, since the past-perfect tense
indicates that one event in the past occurred
prior to another event in the past, the pasttense
did would be required rather than the
present-tense have.
Th e correct answer is C.

所以我想知道这个题翻译过来是啥意思呢?

their wines are priced to sell, and they do....我不明白这句话与上一句是什么逻辑关系呢?

请NN们指教.

沙发
发表于 2009-9-9 22:51:00 | 只看该作者
他们的酒被削价促销,并且它们真的(卖的的很好)。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-11 07:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用skyzhang在2009/9/9 22:51:00的发言:
他们的酒被削价促销,并且它们真的(卖的的很好)。

你又帮我解决了一个问题!多谢!请问skyzhang是已经考完的NN吗?
地板
发表于 2009-9-11 16:18:00 | 只看该作者

也是受煎熬大军中的一员。。。。

5#
发表于 2011-5-20 12:25:35 | 只看该作者
The most important rule we need to remember for this question is one of the rules of ellipsis:

If you omit a word in a sentence, that word must have already appeared in the sentence.

In this question, the original version, if "un-ellipsed," would look like this:

In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines have been priced to sell, and they are selling.

You will notice that the ellipsed word is selling, but this word does NOT appear in the sentence before.

In the correct answer choice, we use do to substitute sell. Remember, do can be used to replace a verb phrase, as in the sentence, She thinks I don't care about my grades, but I do. In this sentence, do replaces care.

Make sense?
6#
发表于 2011-5-23 14:59:50 | 只看该作者
我有一个疑惑。。。their wines have been priced to sell, and they do.
前面一个their指代italian vintners,那么后面那个they按照楼上的解释指代了wines。。。。gmat不是说同一个句子里面同种代词不会指代不同事物,不然会产生歧义。。。
我一直的理解是。。。。他们的酒一直都是定价销售的(因为是完成时),但是意大利酒商(这次真的降价销售了)。可是又不通。。。。感觉楼上的意思更加贴切。。。可是。。。又代词不同指代。。。

求指导~~~
7#
发表于 2011-5-25 06:47:43 | 只看该作者
up
8#
发表于 2011-6-2 01:29:01 | 只看该作者
uppp
9#
发表于 2011-6-2 11:12:00 | 只看该作者
后面那个they指的是酒商吧,and they do 意思是不是他们确实这么做着(降价卖酒)
10#
发表于 2011-6-2 15:09:36 | 只看该作者
还是confusing。。。。可否这样理解:and连接的前后两个verb phrase,verb的形式一定是平行一致的?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-13 23:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部