ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1401|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-1-7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-9 13:13:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-1-7

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.
  • that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
                
  • that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
                
  • that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
                
  • CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
                
  • CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times
                

请问C compared 前面加了as,在意思理解上于A 不加as的campared有什么区别呢?

沙发
发表于 2009-9-9 13:24:00 | 只看该作者

as在这里相当于when 引导一个状语从句

A compared的逻辑主语是419倍 比较后面的是ratio of ...

C 是419倍和42倍的比较


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/10 12:31:52编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-9 23:14:00 | 只看该作者

when compared to,逻辑主语不还是逐句主语吗???

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 15:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部