about "ing"

ca3ltoys

75.    During    her    lecture    the    speaker    used    map    to    clarify    directional    terms,    for    not    everyone    in    attendance    was    knowledgeable    that    winds    are    designated    by    the    direction    from    which    they    come.
(A)    or    not    everyone    in    attendance    was    knowledgeable
(B)    for    everyone    in    attendance    did    not    know
(C)    with    everyone    in    attendance    not    knowing
(D)    with    everyone    attending    not    knowledgeable
(E)    for    not    everyone    attending    knew



the best answer is e, while as to LZM, only the tense is the same, we can use participle, while the answer E here, the tense of main clause is past-"knew", therefore, I think it's wrong, please help me to crack it. thanks

Snazzy

do u have a completel question?

weiyu

"that    winds    are    designated    by    the    direction    from    which    they    come " is mentioned as a scientific priciple, therefore the present tense is available.


本题关键：１．部分否定 not all, not everyone.     2. 实意动词》形容词

ca3ltoys

我的意思是根据刘振民讲的如果用现在分词做定语,必须要求其两个动作一致,否则只能用从句,这里用attending修饰not everyone,而后面动词为knew,过去式,时态不一致.


请问怎么讲????

ca3ltoys

UP!高手帮忙看看??

bon

确实是个问题


    

jnlvo

刘振民的总结太绝对化了，og才是权威。如果og上有这么一说，那确实有问题，只是我好像没看到过。

kid

偶也想知道为什么attending

有这个选项的话，偶会选择for    not    everyone    attended knew