[求助][讨论]GWD21-Q19

zhongyukai

Regardless of their form or function, all aerodynamically enhanced, curved objects made for throwing have been called boomerangs by non-Australians even since 1788, when Europeans saw Dharug-speaking men tossing “bumariny” in the area later known as Sydney.

 

A.    Regardless of their form or function, all aerodynamically enhanced, curved objects made for throwing have been called boomerangs by non-Australians ever since 1788,

B.    Regardless of their form or function, any aerodynamically enhanced, curved object made for throwing has been called a boomerang by non-Australians ever since 1788,

C.    Ever since 1788, non-Australians have called all aerodynamically enhanced, curved objects made for throwing boomerangs, regardless of their form or function, from

D.    Ever since 1788, any aerodynamically enhanced, curved object made for throwing has been called a boomerang by non-Australians, regardless of its form or function, from

E.     Non-Australians have called all aerodynamically enhanced, curved objects made for throwing boomerangs ever since 1788, regardless of their form or function, from

选出答案并不难，CDE from when肯定是错的了。AB当中，A和前面的their对应。但我的问题是，后面主语为什么可以是物？不顾······，主语应该是人吧？那样东西可以不顾·····，然后被人叫做······太诡异了吧？请NN指点！

zhongyukai

顶起！

zhongyukai

没有人回答一下吗？

yingS

Regardless of their form or function, all aerodynamically enhanced,状语
                curved objects主语
                made for throwing宾语
                have been called谓语 boomerangs by non-Australians even since 1788,

整个句子相当于 curved objects have been called

made for throwing做定语修饰curved objects made过去分词表示被动

zhongyukai

以下是引用yingS在2009/8/15 8:52:00的发言：

Regardless of their form or function, all aerodynamically enhanced,状语
    curved objects主语
    made for throwing宾语
    have been called谓语 boomerangs by non-Australians even since 1788,

整个句子相当于 curved objects have been called

made for throwing做定语修饰curved objects made过去分词表示被动

谢谢这位NN。句子成分我倒是看清了。我的问题是regardless是不顾，不管······的意思吧？那这句话翻译出来不就是，不顾，不管。。。。。。，curved objects 已经被人们叫做。。。。。。。这个逻辑不对吧？应该是人们不顾。。。。。。把curved objects叫做。。。。。。。吧？我的意思就是regardless开头做状语的话，后面的主语应该是人而不是物，这样才比较恰当呀。

zhongyukai

再次呼唤NN

abbyabby

是不考虑这些东西的形式和功能  这个意思

anniezhang12

我也有相同的疑问

“是不考虑这些东西的形式和功能  这个意思” 不考虑应该也是“人”不去考虑~~应该人做主语？

flywer

今天做这个题目  看到这个帖子  虽然好像已经过很久了  

flywer

我觉得是这样的  regardless of  的用法可能有点像  countary to  不用考虑逻辑主语的问题   就是一种被理解的状态
比方说这个句子
Categorical moral reasoning locates morality in certain absolute moral requirements, certain categorical duties and rights, regardless of the consequences.
绝对主义道德推理认为,是否道德取决于特定的绝对道德准则，取决于绝对明确的义务与权利，而不管后果如何。
这里的主语也不是人