ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Shoppers in sporting goods stores, unlike in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, not buying a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but they leave with a basketball only.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3070|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]新prep1,213

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-6-22 23:14:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]新prep1,213

213.       (31838-!-item-!-188;#058&006170)       (GWD-3-Q34)

 

Shoppers in sporting goods stores, unlike in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, not buying a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but they leave with a basketball only

A. in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, not buying a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but they leave with a basketball only

B. in department stores, shop impulsively very little; someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and not also buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well

C. those in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, do not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but leave with only a basketball

D. those in department stores, do very little impulse shopping; someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well

E. department stores, shop impulsively very little; someone will not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball but will leave with only a basketball

Willand后可省,那么can可否??

沙发
发表于 2009-6-23 02:26:00 | 只看该作者

好问题.

我根据你的思路想到了这么一个例子:

I can play basketball and go to the court everyday.

这是否就造成了歧义:

1. 我能打球,并且能每天都去球场.

2. 我能打球,并且每天都去球场.

请NN们指教了~

板凳
发表于 2009-6-23 11:40:00 | 只看该作者
按我的理解就变成了:
我会打球,并且每天都去球场.

地板
发表于 2009-6-23 16:51:00 | 只看该作者

还是那个原则,没有歧义的话可以省略

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-23 21:16:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,感谢msuzengli兄夸奖哈,我个人有这么种感觉,因为后面and接否定not,所以这里will在后面省略是不歧义的。而msuzengli兄提的那个例子我个人认为也是不歧义的,就像另一位兄弟说的,这里面都会理解为我会打球而且每天都去球场,强说歧义我觉得是矫枉过正,不是gmac的本意。就像版主说的,不歧义就没问题。

还说打球的例子,如果改为I can play ball and not go ...这里面我认为很显然and后面就是省略can了,否则就不通了。其实学到今天我挺感谢gmac的,我觉得gmat的语法让我真正的感觉到一门语言是怎样用的。这个就是很好的例子,语言没有一定之规,因为语言的本意就是为了表达思想的,表达清楚了就是正确的语言。

有点跑题了。。说回我的例子,我认为如果后面and没有not还想表示将来时的话就一定要加will了,不然大家都会认为是现在时了。当然,我在cd上看见一个大牛说过,and前后的时态不一定必须是一致的,还是要看句意。也就是说,即使后面没有not也没有will也不能肯定就错了。这或许就是语言的魅力所在吧,当然也是每个人要过的那道坎。。。

6#
发表于 2009-10-3 13:16:00 | 只看该作者

这题C错在哪里呢?

请教一下,我读着知道C不顺,但是不知道错在哪

7#
发表于 2010-2-20 21:45:05 | 只看该作者
这题C错在哪里呢?
请教一下,我读着知道C不顺,但是不知道错在哪
-- by 会员 gracezz (2009/10/3 13:16:00)


C those in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, do not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but leave with only a basketball


C应该错在语义不对吧。原文说了do very little impulse shopping,那么只买个篮球就是符合该描述的,应该用and leave with only a basketball.而此处用but leave with only a basketball,让人不知所云,前后语义矛盾吧。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 20:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部