ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2114|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]新prep2,217

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-6-4 22:01:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]新prep2,217

217.       (31117-!-item-!-188;#058&005981)       (GWD-8-Q11)

 

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

A. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

B. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.

C. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.

D. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.

E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.

严重不会,GWD答案还给错了。。。这道题A难道不歧义么?不会让人无法理解cod和haddock到底有没有没有这项限制么?而紧跟的分句on the size。。也不知道修饰谁的,不是么?c的问题我理解。咱就说a......

沙发
发表于 2009-6-5 03:30:00 | 只看该作者
GWD的答案很多都錯...

search
板凳
发表于 2009-8-18 11:24:00 | 只看该作者
A中their和monkfish单复数不一致呀
地板
发表于 2009-8-18 11:25:00 | 只看该作者
也就是说there be 的对比只能是,there be ..., as there be for ...??
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 06:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部