ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: china101
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]新prep2,210

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2009-12-15 15:05:39 | 只看该作者
LS的,在GMAT语法中,which是不可以指代前面整句话的~

同意doyoga理解的跳跃修饰

PS:prep216的which就是跳跃修饰到了hearings,所以跳跃修饰在没有歧义且指代明确的前提下是可行的~
12#
发表于 2009-12-15 16:22:20 | 只看该作者

210.       (29708-!-item-!-188;#058&004436)       (GWD-12-Q31)



Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

给说说A哪错了。。。outnumbering分句表主句结果,不行么?我觉得逻辑上也说的通啊。。。
-- by 会员 china101 (2009/6/4 21:49:00)





对于A, 从语法上讲,outnumbering在此做状语,具体来说是做结果状语,而结果状语表明主句的行为或状态所导致的结果。
主句是个被动形式,意思是“信被写“,显然,“信的数量更多“不是“信被写“的结果。


另外which引导非限制性定语从句,紧跟被修饰名词是最清楚的表达方法,但在不引起歧义和混淆的时候,可以后置。而此题后置是因为有关系更紧密的介词结构"to Susan Huntington Dickinson"修饰letters, 所以从修饰词顺序和平衡句子重心的角度考虑,which理所当然要放后面(何况如果是修饰人的话,引导词要用who)
Emily Dickinson’s letters ,which were ......  ,  to Susan Huntington Dickinson, ........ 你一看就觉得是awkward.


综上,选E

13#
发表于 2010-5-13 00:27:25 | 只看该作者
大家不觉得那个E的which不对吗?
which不是只能修饰它之前的名词吗?
虽然我知道之前是个人,which不能修饰人
但是难道就因为这样所以which可以跳跃修饰?
-- by 会员 doyoga (2009/11/9 20:19:34)


which 不是只能修饰名词的,在非限定性从句中which可用来修饰整个句子

eg.He broke the expensive vase,which made her mother very angry.

在这里是他打碎了花瓶使她妈妈非常生气,而不是花瓶让他妈妈生气。
-- by 会员 sunsetchen (2009/12/14 22:18:37)



小说一下,在口语中,which可以用来修饰整个句子,但是在GMAT语法中,which只能修饰名词。
14#
发表于 2010-5-13 09:08:20 | 只看该作者
11楼解释的非常合理且清晰。收益了。
15#
发表于 2010-7-31 22:02:40 | 只看该作者
我看着A觉得别扭,可是对E这个which的修饰问题很不解,还是选了A。

这跳跃修饰或者修饰不当要怎么评判啊~~~
16#
发表于 2010-8-14 12:22:15 | 只看该作者
我也选的A,虽然看了大家的解释我大概理解了,不过考试如果遇见类似的题目我一定还是选错。。。
17#
发表于 2010-8-23 03:05:47 | 只看该作者
看OG12 的44页的49题。。。对于a选项错误,解释是who指的是theater,不是那个人,反正我就觉得和这题很矛盾!!!!
18#
发表于 2010-9-22 11:19:26 | 只看该作者
up 一道纠结的题 11楼讲得很清楚
19#
发表于 2010-12-20 18:31:30 | 只看该作者
11楼讲的好!受益,强烈顶。。。
20#
发表于 2011-1-3 16:26:50 | 只看该作者
我选了A
因为觉得E的话,觉得应该是outnumbered
-- by 会员 北拳猪猪 (2009/10/15 20:45:00)

能够理解A的逻辑问题了,不过E是否存在时态问题?能不能说这道题是A/E都有问题,只是要以逻辑准的优先,毕竟时态不妨碍对句意的理解。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 16:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部