ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is lined with lead around the perimeter, thereby improving stability in flight and resulting in longer throws.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 10924|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新prep2-160

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-25 14:30:00 | 只看该作者

新prep2-160

160. (32479-!-item-!-188;#058&007029)

In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is lined with lead around the perimeter, thereby improving stability in flight and resulting in longer throws.
A. In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is
B. According to a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition was concentrated in a metal center, but now it is
C. Once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, the discus used in track competition is now
D. The discus used in track competition, once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, but now
E. The discus used in track competition was once designed having its weight concentrated in a metal center and now

答案C,谁来讲解下这道题?

沙发
发表于 2009-5-25 14:40:00 | 只看该作者
question?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-25 16:13:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用AlienX在2009-5-25 14:40:00的发言:
question?

排除AB是不是因为once和后面的now对应?

E错哪了?是不是was once designed中间加个once就不能表被动了?

地板
发表于 2009-5-26 07:19:00 | 只看该作者
A: In a previous design, the weight<- 邏輯不對

B: According to a previous design, the weight<- 邏輯不對

E: designed to have不是designed having
5#
发表于 2009-5-26 12:08:00 | 只看该作者
题目是讲: 原先的设计是将重心放在金属中心处, 而现在是将其放在边缘.
首先, 我认为这里没有转折的关系, 所以A, B, D的but转折不成立.
再来看A: the weight of the discus (used in track ....), but not it is ..., 此处it指weight of the discus, 与后面的 is lined with lead around the perimeter不匹配, 应该是由discus is lined with lead around the perimeter.
B问题同A.
E我认为是be designed having its weight... 用法不对.
查了朗文词典,一般的用法是:
design something to do something
be designed for somebody/something
be designed as something
纯属个人意见,希望有帮助.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-27 17:49:00 | 只看该作者
thx!
7#
发表于 2009-7-23 18:36:00 | 只看该作者

我有一个疑问~

 E. The discus used in track competition
            was once designed having its weight concentrated in a metal center and now

E中连续2个修饰(黄色和绿色部分)会不会造成修饰不清的情况??

8#
发表于 2009-8-22 09:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用AlienX在2009/5/26 7:19:00的发言:
A: In a previous design, the weight<- 邏輯不對

B: According to a previous design, the weight<- 邏輯不對

E: designed to have不是designed having

according to 应该算是介词吧~ 不存在逻辑主语的问题:)

以上。。新东方语法老师说的。。。

9#
发表于 2009-9-14 22:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用daisyao在2009/7/23 18:36:00的发言:

我有一个疑问~

 E. The discus used in track competition
   was once designed having its weight concentrated in a metal center and now

E中连续2个修饰(黄色和绿色部分)会不会造成修饰不清的情况??

不会呀 一个是定语修饰n. 一个是句子的谓语 E错是缺少第二个可以和前文was对比表时态的助动词is(此时is不应该省)

另外 偶觉得AB的主要是it的指代有歧义 不像C的its那么清楚

10#
发表于 2009-9-22 01:02:00 | 只看该作者
就因为不存在转折关系就排除D么?看来还是我的逻辑有问题
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 10:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部