ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3151|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求问TT GWD9-19

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-22 23:33:00 | 只看该作者

求问TT GWD9-19

GWD-9-Q19:

In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

  1. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted

  2. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting

  3. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts

  4. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting

  5. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted

请教正确答案,我觉得正确答案是A。划线部分前面的a corporation commits....whenever....commits a crime对应前面的“in the US today”,后面的两个if是虚拟语气,所以用过去式"acted"和"benefited"。但是我不是很肯定这个解释,求教,谢谢。

沙发
发表于 2009-4-22 23:46:00 | 只看该作者
正确答案就是A,难道LZ没有答案?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-4-23 00:08:00 | 只看该作者
hi, thx a lot! I do have the answer but it invloves many other mistakes which I have to double check every answer. but thx a lot for help!
地板
发表于 2009-7-9 13:12:00 | 只看该作者

why not e?

5#
发表于 2009-7-9 15:35:00 | 只看该作者
最后一段:“and if the corporation benefited as a result”
注意parallelism
6#
发表于 2009-7-9 16:51:00 | 只看该作者
E:
- corporation不能用whose
- employees和employee不对称
7#
发表于 2009-7-10 00:16:00 | 只看该作者
umm...E中的whose是可以, LS可以看一下OG/Prep, 很多句子都是用whose指代非animated的東東.
LZ可能把E打錯...如果沒打錯"commit a crime"之後的comma造成fragment.
8#
发表于 2011-12-9 16:42:03 | 只看该作者
可是如果A是虚拟的话,为什么主句没有would/might/could 呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 12:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部