望求大虾指点 OG11-50 those found here 为什么说错啊？？？

focuscherry

That educators have not anticipated the impact
                    of microcomputer technology can hardly be
                said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in
                    Future Shock, published in 1970.

(A)        That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault

(B)         That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault

(C)         It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology

(D)        It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology

(E)         The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said

Grammatical construction

Although it is possible to begin a sentence with a subordinate clause beginning with that, this
                        inverted
                        construction often results in errors such as
                    those found here.
                （愁死我了，它说those found here 是错的，它到底错哪了呢？？？我怎么就看不明白呢？）In the original sentence, the subordinate clause that ... technology is followed by the main verb, can ... be said, but then the verb is followed by yet another subordinate clause, that it is their fault. The best way to solve this problem is by putting the sentence in the expected order, with the main clause (It can hardly be said) preceding the subordinate clause (that ... )For greater clarity and concision, the
                two
                subordinate clauses should be condensed into one:
                educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.

AlienX

"those found here"沒有問題
"as those found here"是"就如這題看到的errors"

focuscherry

呀！！！原来是这样啊~~~~~~~汗！！

谢谢版主啊，真是一语惊醒梦中人哦！

我看多了都看傻了，呵呵神经错乱了，不好意思

graceguo98

"In the original sentence, the subordinate clause that ... technology is followed by the main verb, can ... be said, but then the verb is followed by yet another subordinate clause, that it is their fault. "

OG 的解释后面部分上述这句话不清楚？

That。。。。technology (主语从句作主语) + can  hardly be said (谓语) that it。。。fault.（said的宾语从句有什么错误吗？）

OG是不是说这样不简洁啊？因为有两个that 引导的从句？

focuscherry

厄，探讨下哈。。。呵呵我也新人。。

我觉得OG喜欢一个主句带一个从句，就像它对正确选项的解释一样。。

至于原句，它觉得不符合语法结构，前面一个长从句，然后谓语，后面又一个长从句，也是你说的不简洁和不符合语法结构吧，而且你说说，开头那么长一从句，不整一个it做形式主语，OG自己看着都难受吧。。。

我觉得它的正确答案一般都要是最完美的，既然OG 里强调了这一点，我觉得以后遇到这种句子，应该都没什么可能会是正确选项吧。。。

呵呵也不知道我说的对不对。。。