prep2-30

lcy19812000

30.  (26078-!-item-!-188;#058&002967)

 

Most of the purported health benefits of tea comes from antioxidants--compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C that inhibit the formation of plaque along the body's blood vessels.

 

(A) comes from antioxidants--compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C that

(B) comes from antioxidants--compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and they

(C) come from antioxidants--compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and

(D) come from antioxidants--compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C and that（D）考点：

(E) come from antioxidants--compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and they

OA。没问题。

《prep注解》说：E中and they inhibit是独立句子，应该与主句并列，无法与从句中的found并列。

我的问题是我就把and they inhibit分句看作与主句并列(they指代benefits)怎么错了？规则是什么？

alohabrian

你要考虑逻辑意思。

这里they语法上是指代benefits的，但benefits不可以inhabits.

而把inhabits放进修饰compound的从句里 才是逻辑上合理的。

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-12 15:58:05编辑过]

lcy19812000

谢谢楼上，我接受这种说法。

看《prep注解》的时候，知道要从逻辑上去考虑，但是没觉得逻辑上有什么问题。（因为我理解inhibit就是benefits之所以被称之为benefits的方式啊，换句话说，因为有inhibit的功能，所以被叫做benefits）

听你的意见，我现在觉得还是有微小差别的。compound inhibit更科学，更严谨一些。

ozymendias

《prep注解》说：E中and they inhibit是独立句子，应该与主句并列，无法与从句中的found并列。

-- by 会员 lcy19812000 (2009/4/12 15:12:00)

但是这句话是什么意思？不明白，恳请NN指点！

tczhy0824

这里出现they还有一个问题就是指代不清，既然楼主可以理解为they指代 benefits，我可以理解为they指代compounds，那么不就有歧义了吗