以下是引用jelt2359在2009-7-9 17:50:00的发言: That post will take much too long to answer. The two aren't necessarily the same thing. Every school is 'unique', after all, there's no other like it. But one way you can think about what matters to you are to think about the following (these are just some traits where schools typically defer. What they mean to you is something you must decide yourself):
Traits to think about include, approach (quantitative vs qualitative); teaching style (case vs lecture vs mix); class size (big, small, etc); alumni size (determined by age of programme, number of alumni (including undergrad alumni if applicable)) and more specifically alumni size in the country you are interested in; number of electives offered; flexibility of the core curriculum; location (closeness to NY, Chicago, whereever else you want to work, and what that means about 1) your ability to network 2) firms' expectations of how much you need to network); and finally, background of class- how international, how diverse in terms of professional backgrounds and age; and so on.
As for the type of people who are admitted, there is no 'typical' person. What there are are people who understand where Wharton stands on the traits above, and has decided that Wharton is the best 'fit' for them given what it offers.
I know this sounds very official, but I truly believe it. If you compare my background with some other Wharton alums here, I think you'll find that I'm living proof that there is no 'typical admit'.
Thanx, Jelt2359 , That's a very comprehensive answer. Just one more, I dont' quite understand " the firms' expectation of how much you need to network", would firms expect people to network a lot when they are recruiting? |