ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: majia09
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[录取汇报] Tough choice: In @ Stanford and MIT

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2009-2-5 20:26:00 | 只看该作者

I think Stanford is stronger in enterprenurship because of its locatioin. After all, it is in silicon valley. And Stanford people is also nice and smart.

Either one is great, there is no wrong decision between these two. You are super Niu! Just flip a coin.

22#
发表于 2009-2-6 00:08:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kevintown在2009-1-30 7:46:00的发言:

Stanford is strong in every way!

some tips from US streets:

if you want to be a happy man, choose stanford!

if you want to be a tech nerd(that can hack the world), choose MIT

if you want to be a TYPICAL leader(tyrant), choose HBS!

if you want to be a banker, choose Wharton!

haha, good one.

I dont think this a tough choice. The two schools are distinctly different. MIT is more Quantitative and Stanford is more Qualitative.

If u are a quant guy, go MIT; if u are a libra-art guy, go Stanford.

However, as far as MBA is concerned... qualitative is more useful than quantitative... my 5 cents.

23#
发表于 2009-2-6 00:47:00 | 只看该作者
I think the answer is very simple: STANFORD. And I wouldn't hesitate for even one millisecond! Always go to the best b-school you can go to. By the commonly used criteria, Stanford is clearly better than MIT.
24#
发表于 2009-2-6 06:17:00 | 只看该作者

Basically, LZ is joking with us! i think

No one would even bother to ask this question. since MBA is not a normal graduate degree...

25#
发表于 2009-2-6 10:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kevintown在2009-2-6 6:17:00的发言:

Basically, LZ is joking with us! i think

No one would even bother to ask this question. since MBA is not a normal graduate degree...

不是吧。。。如果我拿到stanford和MIT我也会犹豫的 哈哈 sloan是我的dream school

26#
发表于 2009-2-6 14:08:00 | 只看该作者

to sum up,lz太牛了,拿到两个这么好的offer。

why not celerate first and relax a little bit? The answer itself may comes to you.

27#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-6 14:53:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ziyangzhuo在2009-2-6 14:08:00的发言:

to sum up,lz太牛了,拿到两个这么好的offer。

why not celerate first and relax a little bit? The answer itself may comes to you.

For the first two days, I felt like I am over the moon. But then I started considering the decision, I lost the excitment completely, and only thinking that I do not want to loose either one. They are top in different way and I want both.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-8 15:15:42编辑过]
28#
发表于 2009-2-6 17:09:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得您都到这地步了是不是该想想enjoy your life了~~
29#
发表于 2009-2-8 14:49:00 | 只看该作者

这个ID真有意思,我也以为是"马甲"呢,而且还是第九个马甲...

我也赞成斯坦福:

1。前3和前10的品牌价值是有明显差异的

2。感觉Sloan在中国的校友网不强,如果打算回国发展,这又是个减分因素

30#
发表于 2009-2-8 17:35:00 | 只看该作者

学校的品牌价值和奢侈品牌的价值类似,历史都是其最重要的资本。这点上麻省理工要优于斯坦福。当然,斯坦福是新贵,也不弱。

据我和外籍同事的接触,在欧洲和亚洲的大部风地区,麻省理工的名气要比斯坦福稍强,我认识好几个公司的CTO都是MIT的(不过不是Sloan)。在大陆斯坦福的名气更大一点。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-8 17:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部