ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1760|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT 97-02-1-14

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-20 15:23:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT 97-02-1-14

In jurisdictions where use of headlights is optional when visibility is good, drivers who use headlights at all times are less likely to be involved in a collision than are drivers whose use headlights only when visibility is poor. Yet Hightway Safety Department records show that making use of headlights mandatory at all times does nothing to reduce the overall number of collisions.

which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy in the information above?

(C)only very careful drivers use headlights when their use is not legally required.

this is the correct answer?   Can someone explain why ? Thanks!

沙发
发表于 2008-11-28 04:55:00 | 只看该作者

没有法律规定的时候,只有careful driver开灯.即事故降低的原因都归于这些人.

有法律规定的时候, 除了careful driver还加上 uncareful driver开灯.但是后者并不对事故降低有影响.所以有没有法律规定,效果是一样的.

板凳
发表于 2009-3-9 12:23:00 | 只看该作者
本题旨在找一个论据(事实)证明结论(does nothing to reduce collisions),而这个事实,就是那些有没有法律规定,都不认真开车而导致事故的人。
地板
发表于 2009-5-29 14:24:00 | 只看该作者
请问哪里有97-02的试题?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 23:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部