又来丢人来了 帮帮忙

豆豆沙

那天写了篇作文   结果是几乎每句话都有问题.........沉思了几天又写来了.有心人帮帮忙   拜托了 基础太烂 大家见谅 耽搁你们宝贵的时间帮我改改吧   

   

It has been said, “Not everything that is learned is contained in books.” Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?

 

   Some people hold the opinion that learned form practice is more important since the experience as a crucial demonstration of ability to company, other people still claim that traditional books is the major media of learning. From my perspective, it was equally that both books and experience are important and they are two basic ways of learning. However, it was unfair to say that if we do not forst see both sides of the story.

   Most people believe that” a book is like a garden carried the pocket”. The large or greater part of diffusion of knowledge through books. Things that is very easy or too easy to obtain knowledge by reading from books no matter where you are even for free such as in library. Moreover, it was accumulation of experience from ancestor that books inherited. Learning from books could save a lot of time for us doing other things. Most important of all, the systematic knowledge in books is quickly absorbed for us.

On the other hand, experience is indispensable to gain knowledge. The knowledge obtained from practice, such as chemical, biology, physics, are more interesting than those which gained from books. One of its main advantages is practice could deepen our impression. In addition, learning by experience, not reading, is the only way to gain some knowledge. For instance, only by a detailed manual of swimming skills does it seem useless that one learn to swim. we have to jump into water and learned the knowledge form experience.

After carefully analysis, it was not hard to see that learned form books and obtained knowledge by experience are equally important. Only combine theory with practice will you gain comprehensive knowledge.

 

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-19 22:38:01编辑过]