perp 1-36和prep 1-37 的比较问题...

nancyhearste

prep 1-36
Thomas Eakins's powerful style and his choices of subject--the advances in modern surgery, the discipline of sport, the strains of individuals in tension with society or even with themselves--was as disturbing to his own time as it is compelling for ours.  
(A) was as disturbing to his own time as it is
(B) were as disturbing to his own time as they are
(C) has been as disturbing in his own time as they are
(D) had been as disturbing in his own time as it was
(E) have been as disturbing in his own time as
answer: B
are确实需要补出，因为时态变化了，可是不是很明白为什么要补出they，白勇的书上说“比较从句的主语与主句主语相同，可以省略”...望NN们帮我解释...

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-3 0:32:37编辑过]

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2008/9/2 22:40:00)

不是NN，发表一下自己的看法，我觉得助动词是否补出，是相对主语来说的，如果只补出助动词，而没有相应的主语与其对应是没有意义的，因为不能清楚的显示这个动作的发动者。所以只要有补出助动词，那么必然会出现主语也补出。但是OG11-37这题很特殊，因为主语American已经是比较的一部分了，所以省略了，当然这种情况还是很少见的。

鄙人愚见，欢迎指正！

stleung

E是肯定不对了，因为句子中没有完成时态的迹象，一开始自己也考虑是E，也是基于平行条件，但是后来仔细想想发现E的确不行，至于为什么是B我也没想明白，估计是比较之下相对准确表达的原则吧！~

kathytc

同不明白

Rolita

67166
查了一下张道真的语用字典：
1-37应该是作为引导并列成分用的，2里面的前两个句子(She did not stir nor look up；For ten days he did not see Tanis nor telephone to her.)貌似表明了，不用再加主语的情况也是有的...不过...这两个个主语确实是rather simple...而且也不是引导分句
而第三个里面not引导分句的例子无一例外都是补全了主谓，恩，我认为可以下此论断了。

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-3 18:56:27编辑过]

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2008/9/3 13:55:00)

收藏

爱力宏的小搓板

as。。。。as    这边是不是并列呀？？？