介词短语直接跟在名词后边如果做定语逻辑合理，是不是只做定语？

aeoluseros

介词短语直接跟在名词后边如果做定语逻辑合理，是不是只做定语？

Zeldaw

恩，可以这么说的。

BTW：LZ不要发小字报拉，虽然即使发了我也一般不会去删。小字报是有重要的事情才用的。

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-8-29 11:04:41编辑过]

aeoluseros

以下是引用Zeldaw在2008-8-29 10:54:00的发言：

恩，可以这么说的。

BTW：LZ不要发小字报拉，虽然即使发了我也一般不会去删。小字报是有重要的事情才用的。

恩，太感谢了！虚心接受坚决改之~

rorarora

如果这个介词定语是放在整个句子的后面，则可能是修饰主句谓语，要小心。

其余则修饰相邻名词。

Zeldaw

以下是引用rorarora在2008-8-30 0:34:00的发言：

如果这个介词定语是放在整个句子的后面，则可能是修饰主句谓语，要小心。

其余则修饰相邻名词。

恩，我理解的紧跟就是没有逗号。如果误导 了ＬＺ，　在这里道歉，汗。

aeoluseros

mo............

aeoluseros

还想补充下...如果前面是名词短语，貌似应该修饰名词短语的核心词...不知道这说法对不对...

rorarora

对的，

A of B这个短语，应该当作A理解，大部分情况均如此。

这一点，可以破解很多题目。

aeoluseros

发现一个例外。。。for + n.是不做定语，而是做时间状语。for确实比较特殊。

prep,1-75题...

Beneath the soil of the Malheur National Forest in eastern Oregon, a fungus has for centuries been
slowly weaving its way through the roots of trees, to become the largest living single organism
known to humans.

(A) has for centuries been slowly weaving its way through the roots of trees, to become
(B) has slowly woven its way through the roots of trees for centuries, and so becoming
(C) that has been slowly weaving its way through the roots of trees for centuries has become
(D) that has for centuries slowly woven its way through the roots of trees and has become
(E) that, having slowly woven its way through the roots of trees for centuries, to become

answer: C

添加在此for的解释：

used to say how long an action or situation continues for
　Bake the cake for 40 minutes.
　We had been talking for a good half hour.
　He's been off work for a while.

-------

只能讲，具体的还是应该看逻辑意思。

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-11 12:27:35编辑过]

aeoluseros

以此贴跟踪不放于句首的形容词短语的修饰对象，大家若有见到一起补充。

形容词短语放在后面前面有逗号貌似还是做定语：

100.
            Bihar is India’s poorest state, with an annual per capita income of $111, lower than in the most impoverished countries of the world.

(A) lower than in

(B) lower than that of

(C) and lower than that of

(D) which is lower than in

(E) which is lower than it is in

key:B