ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1366|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG11DT-41

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-26 14:32:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG11DT-41

OG11测试题部分,语法题第41题,题目最后面的than was...为什么用“was”,而不用“were”?than后面省略的成分不是the development...the use... and the standardization吗?复合主语的谓语动词为什么用单数呢?

沙发
发表于 2008-8-26 16:09:00 | 只看该作者
please post the full question
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-26 16:58:00 | 只看该作者

Excavators at the Indus Valley site of Harappa in eastern Pakistan say the discovery of inscribed shards dating to circa 2800-2600 BC indicates that the development of a Harappan writing system,the use of inscribed seals impressed into clay for marking ownership,and the standardization of weights for trade or taxation occurred many decades,if not centuries, earlier than was previously believed.

正确答案已经代入原文中。

地板
发表于 2008-8-26 23:37:00 | 只看该作者
hmm...not sure.
X, Y and Y occurred many decades eariler than (the date) was previously believed.
可能是固定用法.
OG上有一些固定用法:
....than ever before.
....than previously thought.
anyone?
5#
发表于 2008-8-27 00:01:00 | 只看该作者
关键是应该弄清楚到底WAS 修饰的什么,是这三个并列的名词呢,还是楼上所说的修饰的是一个DATA, 还是前面的DISCOVERY?
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-27 00:24:00 | 只看该作者
从that到句子结束,应该都是indicate的宾语,所以was不可能修饰指向discovery。说was修饰一个虚拟的date,从逻辑上考虑的话还是蛮有道理的,earlier是不是已经暗示了比较的对象就是“the date”?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-6 04:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部