谢谢版主 但为啥replacement是啰嗦呢???呜呜
我觉得B这里啰嗦不啰嗦不是焦点,关键的是整体的逻辑关系错误了。如版主说的,A中说了两点,the average output of ironwork tripled的原因,1是因为:(as a result of) several improvements in blowing machiner,2是因为: (and because) coal replaced charcoal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore。这两个原因缺一不可,B中没有了因果关系的连接词,错。这种题不宜扣得太细,出题人主要考察逻辑关系。还有一点是时间状语,只有A把时间状语用 “,”和整句分开,放在句首,让逻辑关系清楚明白,其他的都比较含糊,也不符合英文的表达习惯。 [此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-6 14:27:45编辑过] -- by 会员 spyder1011 (2008/9/6 14:26:00)
I agree. 逻辑意思才是重点,这道题关键是把因果关系说清楚,两个原因导致一个结果。 B. Over the course of the eighteenth century atripling in the average output of ironwork was due to the replacement ofcharcoal by coal for the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore, in addition toseveral improvements in blowing machinery. 原因与结果关系不明确,两个原因之间的并列关系不明确,整个句子结构也比较wordy and awkward.
C. With charcoal’s beingreplaced by coal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore and severalimprovements in blowing machinery, the average output of ironwork tripled overthe eighteenth century. 这里使用with,就已经丧失了原句要表达的因果含义,并且with charcoal's being的使用也相当的awkward;同时,从时态上考虑,用being也不合适,因为整个句子描述的是发生在过去的事情,没有任何提示表明replace正在进行。
D. The replacement of charcoalwith coal for the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore and severalimprovements in blowing machinery, the average output of ironwork tripled overthe eighteenth century. 这里句子的第一部分没有任何连词,两个原因被当成句子主语the average output的同位语了。
E. Charcoal being replaced by coal as the fuelused in the smelting of iron ore, and several improvements in blowingmachinery, which tripled the average output of ironwork over the course of theeighteenth century. 不是一个完整的句子,缺main verb. |