ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1385|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

有关which,that,分词修饰的问题!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-17 22:07:00 | 只看该作者

有关which,that,分词修饰的问题!

有关which,that,分词修饰的问题,一直都没搞得非常清楚,快考试了,想请大家帮我看看!谢谢xdjm们!

1。

Clouds are formed from the evaporation of the oceans’ water that is warmed by the Sun and rises high into the atmosphere, condensing in tiny droplets on minute particles of dust.

Condensing 可以就近修饰atmosphere吗?还是一定要修是主句主语??

 

2。

Clouds form by the Sun’s warmth evaporating the water in the oceans,
                    which
rises high into the atmosphere, condensing in tiny droplets on minute particles of dust

Which可以跳跃修饰water吗?还是需要就近修饰oceans?语义上which这里是指water啊。。

3。

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson,
                    which

                
were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbe

同样的,which可以跳跃修饰吗?虽然逻辑上知道它修饰的是letters,但语法结构上呢,是就近修饰dickinson还是letters?

谢谢谢谢大家!实在是渴望解答阿....

沙发
发表于 2008-8-17 22:14:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用hhelain在2008-8-17 22:07:00的发言:

有关which,that,分词修饰的问题,一直都没搞得非常清楚,快考试了,想请大家帮我看看!谢谢xdjm们!

1。

Clouds are formed from the evaporation of the oceans’ water that is warmed by the Sun and rises high into the atmosphere, condensing in tiny droplets on minute particles of dust.

Condensing 可以就近修饰atmosphere吗?还是一定要修是主句主语??

 分词在句末有歧义,可以做定语,也可以做状语修饰主谓,除非能明显的用逻辑意思排除其中一种可能性。

 分词在句末有歧义,可以做定语,也可以做状语修饰主谓,除非能明显的用逻辑意思排除其中一种可能性。

2。

Clouds form by the Sun’s warmth evaporating the water in the oceans,
     which
rises high into the atmosphere, condensing in tiny droplets on minute particles of dust

Which可以跳跃修饰water吗?还是需要就近修饰oceans?语义上which这里是指water啊。。

3。

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson,
     which

    
were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbe

同样的,which可以跳跃修饰吗?虽然逻辑上知道它修饰的是letters,但语法结构上呢,是就近修饰dickinson还是letters?

谢谢谢谢大家!实在是渴望解答阿....

2和3 一样也不一样。 因为2里面, which确实有修饰歧义,最靠近的成分是oceans, 而3里面虽然貌似和2类似,但注意which前面是人,which不能指代人,所以只能指代letters 了。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-18 13:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用dingxiang在2008-8-17 22:14:00的发言:

非常感谢!

地板
发表于 2008-8-18 15:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用hhelain在2008-8-17 22:07:00的发言:

有关which,that,分词修饰的问题,一直都没搞得非常清楚,快考试了,想请大家帮我看看!谢谢xdjm们!

1。

Clouds are formed from the evaporation of the oceans’ water that is warmed by the Sun and rises high into the atmosphere, condensing in tiny droplets on minute particles of dust.

Condensing 可以就近修饰atmosphere吗?还是一定要修是主句主语??

2。

Clouds form by the Sun’s warmth evaporating the water in the oceans,
     which
rises high into the atmosphere, condensing in tiny droplets on minute particles of dust

Which可以跳跃修饰water吗?还是需要就近修饰oceans?语义上which这里是指water啊。。

3。

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson,
     which

    
were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbe

同样的,which可以跳跃修饰吗?虽然逻辑上知道它修饰的是letters,但语法结构上呢,是就近修饰dickinson还是letters?

这里which 后面用were,排除了修饰单数名词dickinson的可能性,跳跃修饰letters。上面的也是,如果修饰oceans的话,后面rises就不一致了。

谢谢谢谢大家!实在是渴望解答阿....

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-11 19:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部