关于that的跳跃修饰--大全413

zhaxi8313

今天做题碰到一个

大全-675      Studies show that young people with higher-than-average blood pressure and their families have a history of high blood pressure are more likely than others to develop a severe form of the condition.

(A) and their families have a history of high blood pressure

(B) whose families have a history of high blood pressure

(C) and a history of high blood pressure runs in the family

(D) whose families have a history of high blood pressure running in them（B）

(E) with a history of high blood pressure running in their family

这里面的whose的修饰就是跃过with短语的限定直接修饰yong people的

zhaxi8313

这里的which能跳到前面修饰吗?

大全- 678     Television programs developed in conjunction with the marketing of toys, which was once prohibited by federal regulations, are thriving in the free market conditions permitted by the current Federal Communications Commission.

(A) Television programs developed in conjunction with the marketing of toys, which was once prohibited by federal regulations, are

(B) Television programs developed in conjunction with the marketing of toys, a practice that federal regulations once prohibited, is

(C) Developing television programs in conjunction with the marketing of toys, as once prohibited by federal regulations, is; 

(D) Federal regulations once prohibited developing television programs in conjunction with the marketing of toys, but they are;  （E）

(E) Federal regulations once prohibited developing television programs in conjunction with the marketing of toys, but such programs are

当时自己做题是靠which修饰前面的toys而排除的,但是后来看到大牛的帖子,没有提到这一点的,都是通过A中的was的主位不一致来排除的,那么到底这里的which修饰的是哪个呢?我一直以来做题就用which肯定直接修饰靠前的名词来排除选项的,屡试不爽;这次要把跳跃修饰给彻底搞清楚了,希望大家懂的帮帮忙;

kathyseven

我是语法白痴 这几个问题想了一下午都没想通 可能基础太差了希望nn指点！！！！！

1 From the bark of the paper birch tree the Menomini crafted a canoe about twenty feet long and two feet wide, with small ribs and rails of cedar, which could carry four persons or eight hundred pounds of baggage so light that a person could easily portage it around impeding rapids.

上面这道题我会选答案但是我不明白 which could carry four 这个句子怎么能修饰canoe去，为什么不能修饰 cedar，或者修饰 rails of cedar；

三个问题：

1. 定语从句不是就近修饰吗？？为什么不能修饰介词短语中的名词呢？？因为是非限？？还是因为介词短语与主句是独立主格的关系？

2 如果是n of n'这样的结构 定语从句修饰哪个名词？？限制性定语从句和非限制性在这样的情况下有没有区别？

3.。。。。with短语不能向后修饰从句吗？？？？

2 还有一句话：。。。。。many others in the film industry, however, contend that the technique degrades major works of art, which they liken to putting lipstick on a Greek statue.

这个也是选项没有问题 但这里的which指代是什么呢 major works of art 还是art呢

名词性从句和定语从句在这样的修饰指代上面有什么区别吗 就是这种 n of n 形式的 是修饰后面的 N呢 还是修饰整个的n of n???

3.关于it 的指代问题

我一直觉得从句中的it指代主句中的单数中心词 但有时候主语宾语都是单数名词 优先哪个呢？

As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.

这里的第一个it肯定指代a rudimentary sense of vision，但是为什么不能是baby呢？？？

还有上面那句many others in the film industry, however, contend that the technique degrades major works of art, which they liken to putting lipstick on a Greek statue.  如果major works of art变成单数 it能否指代major work呢

SuccessMBA08

以下是引用小黑猫晒太阳在2008-7-16 19:04:00的发言：

同问同问~

ETS的SC好像很活,难题都是逻辑为主

说到that的跳跃修饰，对比OG11-116

Out of America's fascination with all thing antique has grown a market for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures that is bringing back the ...

要硬从语法上讲that也可以修饰furniture呀

有人有这方面的总结吗？谢谢 谢谢

这句THAT不可能修饰furnitureS(复数),THAT后是IS只能修饰a market
    

SuccessMBA08

以下是引用zhaxi8313在2008-7-18 5:18:00的发言：

这里的which能跳到前面修饰吗?

大全- 678     Television programs developed in conjunction with the marketing of toys, which was once prohibited by federal regulations, are thriving in the free market conditions permitted by the current Federal Communications Commission.

(A) Television programs developed in conjunction with the marketing of toys, which was once prohibited by federal regulations, are

(B) Television programs developed in conjunction with the marketing of toys, a practice that federal regulations once prohibited, is

(C) Developing television programs in conjunction with the marketing of toys, as once prohibited by federal regulations, is; 

(D) Federal regulations once prohibited developing television programs in conjunction with the marketing of toys, but they are;  （E）

(E) Federal regulations once prohibited developing television programs in conjunction with the marketing of toys, but such programs are

当时自己做题是靠which修饰前面的toys而排除的,但是后来看到大牛的帖子,没有提到这一点的,都是通过A中的was的主位不一致来排除的,那么到底这里的which修饰的是哪个呢?我一直以来做题就用which肯定直接修饰靠前的名词来排除选项的,屡试不爽;这次要把跳跃修饰给彻底搞清楚了,希望大家懂的帮帮忙;

兄弟,我觉得你的排除方法也可以(逻辑意思不对),其他NN的排除方法也不错,可能这个错IS更隐蔽.大家觉得哪,讨论一下!

zhaxi8313

 

以下是引用zhaxi8313在2008-7-18 5:18:00的发言：

这里的which能跳到前面修饰吗?

大全- 678     Television programs developed in conjunction with the marketing of toys, which was once prohibited by federal regulations, are thriving in the free market conditions permitted by the current Federal Communications Commission.

(A) Television programs developed in conjunction with the marketing of toys, which was once prohibited by federal regulations, are

(B) Television programs developed in conjunction with the marketing of toys, a practice that federal regulations once prohibited, is
                

(C) Developing television programs in conjunction with the marketing of toys, as once prohibited by federal regulations, is; 

(D) Federal regulations once prohibited developing television programs in conjunction with the marketing of toys, but they are;  （E）
                

(E) Federal regulations once prohibited developing television programs in conjunction with the marketing of toys, but such programs are

当时自己做题是靠which修饰前面的toys而排除的,但是后来看到大牛的帖子,没有提到这一点的,都是通过A中的was的主位不一致来排除的,那么到底这里的which修饰的是哪个呢?我一直以来做题就用which肯定直接修饰靠前的名词来排除选项的,屡试不爽;这次要把跳跃修饰给彻底搞清楚了,希望大家懂的帮帮忙;

兄弟,我觉得你的排除方法也可以(逻辑意思不对),其他NN的排除方法也不错,可能这个错IS更隐蔽.大家觉得哪,讨论一下!

我觉得这里我用which修饰toys而说逻辑不对排除,那么就默认which不可能跳跃修饰了,N们说which后面的was主谓不一致就是默认which是跳跃修饰前面的programs所以要用were;我觉得还是不能确定which是就近修饰还是跳跃修饰,看OG解释一直是说which就近修饰的;

zhaxi8313

OG 11- 9.     Sunspots, vortices of gas associated with strong electromagnetic activity, are visible as dark spots on the surface of the Sun but have never been sighted on the Sun’s poles or equator.

(A) are visible as dark spots on the surface of the Sun but have never been sighted on

(B) are visible as dark spots that never have been sighted on the surface of the Sun

(C) appear on the surface of the Sun as dark spots although never sighted at

(D) appear as dark spots on the surface of the Sun, although never having been sighted at

(E) appear as dark spots on the Sun’s surface, which have never been sighted on

OG 解释:  E      The relative pronoun which should immediately follow its referent; here which illogically follows surface,
                and its intended referent, either sunspots or dark spots, becomes unclear

照理说这里的which的逻辑修饰应该是跳跃修饰sunspots,但是根据解释看GMAC好像不认可which的跳跃修饰,不知道是个例还是在gmat中通用,

一般人我不告诉他;

 

dingxiang

不好意思，才看到这个帖子

我上次的回帖有误。

其实我想说的是，

当定从前面有介词结构， 要看这个介词结构是做什么成分，如果是做修饰语，修饰介词结构更前面的核心词，那么不用担心定从会指代介词结构里面的名词。

但是当介词结构是做状语，那么就有定从的指代问题了

你前面举的几个例子，似乎都通用。

所以不要随便用“定从跳跃修饰”这种说法，其实根本的原因还是要掌握哪个成分才是核心词。

open to discuss

nk_jade

以下是引用zhaxi8313在2008-7-18 22:31:00的发言：

兄弟,我觉得你的排除方法也可以(逻辑意思不对),其他NN的排除方法也不错,可能这个错IS更隐蔽.大家觉得哪,讨论一下!

我觉得这里我用which修饰toys而说逻辑不对排除,那么就默认which不可能跳跃修饰了,N们说which后面的was主谓不一致就是默认which是跳跃修饰前面的programs所以要用were;我觉得还是不能确定which是就近修饰还是跳跃修饰,看OG解释一直是说which就近修饰的;

我是觉得which引导的句子作为一个单句列出，前后用逗号隔开，这样就像一个插入成分一样，就不是直接修饰前面从句中的的market of toys， 而应该是修饰的是主句中的中心词。

大家看看这样分析可否？

rpch2004

up一下

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-23 23:49:03编辑过]