ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1405|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-39 求助

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-8 22:59:00 | 只看该作者

大全-39 求助

大全-39.        According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of polluted land is liable for the cleanup of the property even if the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution occurred before the title changed hands.

(A) the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution

(B) the owner is not responsible for pollution that

(C) it was not the owner’s responsibility that pollution would have

(D) the responsibility of the owner is not that pollutionB

(E) the responsibility was not the owner’s that pollution would have

答案是B,   

C 为什么不对?


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-8 22:59:23编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-7-8 23:26:00 | 只看该作者

1) Be responsible for sth 对什么负责.

2) 时态不一致. 这是个陈述形式,到土地交接的时候,都不是owner的responsiblity.

3) 仅供参考和讨论.

    逻辑大意不对: B 句, 即使土地的拥有者不对已经发生的污染负责.

                  C 句: would have done sth 是虚拟时态,表示与过去发生的相反.

                       翻译为: 即使土地有污染,也不是土地拥有者的责任.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-12 16:31:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用我爱周末在2008-7-8 23:26:00的发言:

1) Be responsible for sth 对什么负责.

2) 时态不一致. 这是个陈述形式,到土地交接的时候,都不是owner的responsiblity.

3) 仅供参考和讨论.

    逻辑大意不对: B 句, 即使土地的拥有者不对已经发生的污染负责.

                  C 句: would have done sth 是虚拟时态,表示与过去发生的相反.

                       翻译为: 即使土地有污染,也不是土地拥有者的责任.

谢谢 我爱周末 的解答, 

地板
发表于 2008-7-12 18:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rockmax在2008-7-8 22:59:00的发言:

大全-39.        According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of polluted land is liable for the cleanup of the property even if the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution occurred before the title changed hands.

(A) the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution

(B) the owner is not responsible for pollution that

(C) it was not the owner’s responsibility that pollution would have

(D) the responsibility of the owner is not that pollutionB

(E) the responsibility was not the owner’s that pollution would have

答案是B,   

C 为什么不对?


I choose b

划线外说“the owner ”对清扫土地负责

b: 尽管the owner不用对污染负责,这个污染在什么之前已经发生了;语义合理

c:it 指代什么,不清楚,responsibility后面的“that” 指代也不清楚

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 03:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部