"As would be the case" is better than "as is the case" for this sentence because it refers to a hypothetical star of similar mass to the Sun's. If the sentence referred to a specific star to which this happened, then "as was the case" would be appropriate since the construction would refer to an actual event. in choices C and D, "it" refers to "hydrogen" (the subject of the previous clause). This reference leads to the absurd idea that the _hydrogen_ will expand into a red giant AFTER IT'S ALL GONE. Choice C also exhibits a rather obvious parallelism defect, which also happens to be ungrammatical: "and eventually ejecting" not only fails to be parallel to "will expand," but is also, well, wrong.
Choice B is all kinds of wrong. Since "like any star of similar mass" doesn't have a subject, we need "the Sun" right after the comma (and it isn't there). Like choices C and D, this sentence mistakenly employs "it" to refer to hydrogen. And givemeanid has already pointed out the tense problem. |