|
再顶出来问一下，
1。对如下guandream发言：为什么选项E中的those一定指babies，而不是指代women？
以下是引用guandream在2004-1-8 11:26:00的发言：
in the original question there is no " were" after "babies", otherwise, the sentence is run-on sentence. the first point is that "it" refers to thirty years old. here the sentence campara the number of babies, whose mothers were over thirty years old when babies were born, to the number of babies whose mothers' age was under thirty years old when they were born. In choice B, " they" is definite pronoun, so "they" refer to "babies" or "women over thirty years old". if it refers to the first one, the sentence leads to absurdity( object is uncomparable), babies are under thirty years old; if it refers to the second one, they are the same people whose age over thirty years old and under thirty years old , so the sentence cause illogical faulty. In choice C, the verb tense. In choice D, the sentence is unclear to show the comparable point. In choice E, ' those' refers to the babies, thus the sentence is faulty comparism.
I hope my opion is helpful for to understand the question.
2。同如下携隐 的问题：
以下是引用携隐在2004-9-29 17:43:00的发言：
本题答案选A，我没有问题。其他四个选项的错误我也没有问题。但是这里A省略了什么呢？babies born by women是吗？除了相同主语可以省略，相同主语的修饰成份也可以一起省略吗？
选项A，如果连by women也一起省了，会不会被误解为：“there are more babies born by women over thirty years old than babies under it.”？
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-29 11:28:05编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-5-5 17:30:00
