ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5688|回复: 29
打印 上一主题 下一主题

HBS的Essaytopics今天出来了

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-15 23:59:00 | 只看该作者

HBS的Essaytopics今天出来了

Clear Admit HBS Essay Topic Analysis 2008-2009


    

Perhaps
in anticipation of another increase in application volume, Harvard has
again reduced the number of essay questions that candidates must answer
- from 5 last year to 4 this season, down from 6 or 7 essays a few
seasons ago. Further, at just 1800 words total, Harvard’s has become
one of the shorter b-school applications. This underscores the
importance of choosing among essay options judiciously, and using the
limited words in each essay as beneficially as possible. That said,
let’s take a look at the questions for this year:


        

Essay 1: What are your three most substantial accomplishments and why do you view them as such? (600-word limit)

This essay question has been a hallmark of the HBS application for many
years. Due to its top billing, this question could be the first element
of your file that the adcom reads, making this response a great
opportunity to present the reader with three strong stories that
introduce the major themes of your candidacy. Each accomplishment can
be presented as a stand-alone section here, so you needn’t be overly
concerned about composing a seamless narrative.


        

HBS has traditionally been very impact-oriented in evaluating
applicants’ credentials, so one way to determine which three
accomplishments to describe in this essay is to think about the end
results. Experiences in which you made a lasting and quantifiable
impact can lend themselves to concise, factual narratives, and
considering that each accomplishment must be described in approximately
200 words, this can be an important consideration. However, this isn’t
to say that the process followed, skills gained, and lessons learned
along the way aren’t important, too; these factors could be a great way
to address the second half of the question: why you view these
accomplishments as your most significant to date.


        

A final point is that it’s also important to select stories with an
eye to balance. An applicant who describes two professional successes
and one extra-curricular accomplishment, or perhaps one each from the
professional, academic and activities realms, can show that he or she
excels in any environment.


        

Essay 2: What have you learned from a mistake? (400-word limit)

This question makes an appearance for a second consecutive year. The
subject of failure or setback is a popular one for business school
essays in general, and there are a few important elements to consider
in addressing this and similar prompts. Firstly, professional maturity,
self-reflection and insight are key qualities to communicate. Towards
that end, successful essays will describe the mistake in
straightforward, step-by-step detail, and will also own the misstep
rather than making excuses.


        

Another important element to touch on is that you’ve experienced
some growth or development since the initial mistake. While applicants
should not ‘gloss over’ their mistakes, it is important to emphasize
positive growth and the learning experience that can come from missing
the mark. An effective essay will present this growth in terms of
thoughts and feelings, while balancing comments about internal
reflections with descriptions of more external actions and changes in
behavior.


        

Please respond to two of the following (400-word limit each):


        

Essay 3.1: What would you like the MBA Admissions Board to know about your undergraduate academic experience?

While MBA applicants often draw upon their extracurricular experiences
during college as topics for essays, it’s rare that they get a chance
to talk about their more intellectual interests and achievements. This
is your chance to go into some detail about why you chose your school
and major, and tell the admissions committee about your academic
interests and educational milestones. A great essay will underscore an
applicant’s intelligence and work ethic, as well as incorporate some
element of leadership (especially if the applicant had a significant
impact on the department or school as a whole).


        

Essay 3.2: Discuss how you have engaged with a community or organization.

This is the first of two new prompts for HBS this season, and opens a
wide range of topics for discussion and skills and qualities that an
applicant can highlight. While the “organization” component clearly
lends itself to coverage of an extracurricular involvement or
leadership at work or at school, the “community” side could just as
easily apply to international experience or immersion in a new team or
demographic - essentially focusing just on the positive conclusion of a
“culture shock” or “outsider” essay. Harvard’s selection of this prompt
suggests a strong interests in applicants who are proactive in making
connections and building relationships, perhaps toward some specific
cause or goal. The interpersonal elements of this experience will
therefore be of just as much interest and your reasons and the results
of this engagement. Though this essays lends itself nicely to a
discussion of a long-term or ongoing involvement with the community or
organization in question, centering the essay on a single meaningful
anecdote will also be a viable strategy for showing your skills in
action.


        

Essay 3.3: What area of the world are you most curious about and why?

This is another new question for this season, also with a broad reach.
A literal interpretation of this question might focus on geographic
region, but it also invites discussion of an area of knowledge or
inquiry - anything one might explore or investigate.


        

This question could be an excellent choice for joint or concurrent
degree applicants as a substitute for the “career vision” essay; an
MBA/JD applicant might elect to discuss his or her deep interest in the
intersection of business and law, for example.  For the vast majority
of applicants, though, there are a number of strategic considerations
that go along with this prompt.  Because the adcom hopes to get to know
its applicants better through the essays, it’s natural for them to
wonder what most interests them.  It doesn’t seem extremely likely,
though, that one would have a passion worth covering in this essay that
wouldn’t be more constructively discussed in response to one of the
school’s other prompts.  Because it doesn’t make sense to write an
essay about what one doesn’t know, the subject of this response should
ideally be an area of curiosity that one has already explored to some
extent.  One might therefore find that an academic interest is more
naturally covered in “undergraduate experience” option, that a
professional or regional interest fits better with the “career vision”
essay, and that a hobby or cause shared with others works best with the
response about engaging a community or organization.


        

This essay does lend itself well to covering a solo activity or
interest (making it a good platform for World War I buffs and amateur
astrologers to discuss this aspect of their lives), but these are
seldom crucial elements of one’s candidacy.  We don’t mean to say that
there’s no way for the average applicant to answer this question well,
only that he or she should take a good look at this year’s other
options before proceeding.


        

Essay 3.4: What is your career vision and why is this choice meaningful to you?

Always unique among b-schools, HBS not only frames its essay about the
applicant’s professional future in terms of a broad vision rather than
concrete goals, but also makes it optional.


        

Harvard’s adcom tries to identify future business leaders, so
applicants presenting a directed vision will make a positive
impression. Because this essay is about your career vision,
you might summarize your past experiences in a very concise manner
(i.e. just a few sentences) before moving on to a detailed discussion
of your future plans and the reasons that these plans are meaningful to
you. Whereas many schools request a clear description of the candidates
immediate post-MBA program, this particular question lends itself to a
long-term, big picture outlook. Of course, you might also touch on the
ways in which HBS will help you achieve your vision. Think about how
Harvard’s program (specific classes, classmates and clubs) would
prepare you for your future.


        

Conclusion

While each of these topics require a careful approach, one of the more
challenging aspects of the HBS application is assembling the right mix
of anecdotes across essays so as to provide the committee with the most
complete (and strategic) view of your candidacy.  This is compounded by
the fact that HBS allows for several choices in the final two essay
topics.  As such, we recommend that our readers be sure to take a step
back and consider their essays holistically as they move through the
process of topic selection and writing.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-19 22:12:35编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-5-16 03:34:00 | 只看该作者

多谢tristesser!

与去年相比,我发现去掉了Culture Shock,Leadership 和additional information的optional. 加了Community的optional. 两个必选题原封不动的保留。

篇幅从5篇到4篇,在各篇字数没有增加的前提下,篇幅小了20%有余。个人觉得可以施展的空间更小了--难度似乎增大了。

拿掉Culture Shock那题,郁闷,个人觉得对国际学生的优势有所弱化,国际背景展开可能要费点周折融入到别的topic的讨论。

拿掉leadership那题,很郁闷!个人最喜欢的一条题目就是这条leadership 引出的对自身strength and weakness的探讨。现在没了,这方面的信息要琢磨琢磨怎么放到别的题目里了(leadership的讨论我觉得是重中之重。。。)

拿掉最后的万能option题,不知道HBS adcom怎么考虑的,也许会在essay之外加一个session让补充信息。否则对一些有必要说明的问题无法解决。不过这倒还好,没有前两个的影响那么大。。。

新加的Community 的题目要写深似乎要费功夫,要stand out 更难。。。(起码对我来说)但是如果跳过去,又担心community 的background没法展现。去年没明确问也就算了,现在问了,两难的选择。。。况且4选2, career vision基本是必写的,其实就是个3选1。。。琢磨琢磨。。。。6选三的时候已经反复说“鱼与熊掌不能兼得了”,现在四选二 ,“鱼 也只能选鱼腩肉了。。。”

原来的"What global issue is most important to you and why?"改成了“What area of the world are you most curious about and why?” 我觉得可写性因为从"important"到“curious"和“global issue" 到"area of the world"的变化而加强了。但是还是一样比较risky, 题目有可能写得太大而掌握不好尺度。。。毕竟这不是在报 Kennedy School。。。不知道高人有何见解。

其余题目基本是去年的,已经有评论了。估计各个网站的专业评论马上就会出来了。我就瞎掺和一下,抛砖引玉。。。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-16 4:07:11编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2008-5-16 08:32:00 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
地板
发表于 2008-5-16 09:34:00 | 只看该作者
is this for 2009 program?
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-16 09:55:00 | 只看该作者
Yes. It is for 2009 program. http://blog.clearadmit.com/
6#
发表于 2008-5-16 11:10:00 | 只看该作者
thanks for sharing!楼上几位分析的很透彻呀!
7#
发表于 2008-5-16 11:15:00 | 只看该作者

顶一下,这么快就出essay题目了,俺还在和T奋战呢。

惭愧呀

8#
发表于 2008-5-16 11:34:00 | 只看该作者

不会吧,这么早就出题目了?

9#
发表于 2008-5-16 12:27:00 | 只看该作者

David兄分析的很有见地。严重同意,对defining这个关键词的改变,可以看出adcom的良苦用心。

我现在在考虑的是6选3 变成 4选2的影响。像我前面说的,career vision根据经验,几乎是必选的一道。那么其实就是从原来的5选2变成现在的3选1。。。

原来的5中涵盖的topic  包括:

a. leadersihp development (strengths and weakness)

b. culture shock experience

c.undergrad academic experience

e. global issue

f. additional info

现在的3种包括了:

a. (old c) undergrad academic experience

b. (new) Comm/Org

c. (modified e) global area (curious)

也就是说现在你要从你的undergrad, comm and global vision里面选一个出来展开。那么怎么选材,怎么在本来就不富裕还被剪了的篇幅里展开你所有想要touch的要点。的确有点难度。特别如我,本来打算用culture shock作为一个卖点的人士,old b被cut,造成很大的被动。原来编好的story board要进行大改了。有几个问题希望诸位可以讨论讨论:

1。像david 说的,mistake != failure(setback). Wharton去年有一题问得就是setback。Harvard 以前问得也是setback, 现在变成mistake....小弟想听诸位详细讨论到底两者的不同怎么把握。我个人觉得那种"turn lemon into lemonade"的做法似乎比较俗。。。

2。undergrad academic experience的出题点在哪里。是针对什么的。我个人觉得,对于有国外undergrad教育背景的来说,这不啻为填补原来culture shock被cut的空缺。毕竟在外国求学本身会遇到很多culture shock和不适应。各位觉得是否可行。

3。Comm/Org如果不在essay展开,我觉得倒是可以在recomm letter里“补元”(看过Eva的应该懂:)。 但是这样做的后果很有可能是在essay里无法带到Comm的例子,这样的牺牲是否大了点?

4。Global vision这题。我看过评论,认为这题反而最为risky。 400字的篇幅,对展开一个大的话题太紧,但是如果话题小了,又不贴题 。现在改成"curious" and "area of the world", 貌似降低了这种风险,但是考虑到现在除了career,只有一篇的幅度,值得不值得把这宝贵的一个名额给global vision而放弃其他更适合展开自己背景的topic,值得琢磨琢磨。

看完今年的题目,是基本不出所料,但是对裁减了一篇optional还是耿耿于怀。对于story board看来是要重新整理了。希望各位一起加油!

10#
发表于 2008-5-17 04:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kwokyee在2008-5-16 12:27:00的发言:

1。像david 说的,mistake != failure(setback). Wharton去年有一题问得就是setback。Harvard 以前问得也是setback, 现在变成mistake....小弟想听诸位详细讨论到底两者的不同怎么把握。我个人觉得那种"turn lemon into lemonade"的做法似乎比较俗。。。

2。undergrad academic experience的出题点在哪里。是针对什么的。我个人觉得,对于有国外undergrad教育背景的来说,这不啻为填补原来culture shock被cut的空缺。毕竟在外国求学本身会遇到很多culture shock和不适应。各位觉得是否可行。

3。Comm/Org如果不在essay展开,我觉得倒是可以在recomm letter里“补元”(看过Eva的应该懂:)。 但是这样做的后果很有可能是在essay里无法带到Comm的例子,这样的牺牲是否大了点?

4。Global vision这题。我看过评论,认为这题反而最为risky。 400字的篇幅,对展开一个大的话题太紧,但是如果话题小了,又不贴题 。现在改成"curious" and "area of the world", 貌似降低了这种风险,但是考虑到现在除了career,只有一篇的幅度,值得不值得把这宝贵的一个名额给global vision而放弃其他更适合展开自己背景的topic,值得琢磨琢磨。

1. Setback is generally external.  Mistake is internal.

2. Ability to learn, not just from classes but from the overall experience.

3. Recommendation letters are different perspectives.  They want to hear what you think, not just what someone else thinks about you.

4. Each essay and each part of the application should reflect a different part of you.  Take a look at the whole package and think about what's missing.

Good luck!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-14 13:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部