ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1002|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

sec19-07,谁能有更好的解释?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-7 10:05:00 | 只看该作者

sec19-07,谁能有更好的解释?

7.     Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.

(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

(B) of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity

(C) by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity

(D) by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicityA

(E) by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

我想问的是C为什么错误?看了大全的解释( it 不能understood, 应该理解为it was understood by the processes ,这样句意改变不合逻辑),觉得很模糊,还是不明白。

沙发
发表于 2008-5-7 11:11:00 | 只看该作者

个人认为, 主动优于被动.  C 是被动,ETS不倾向被动

板凳
发表于 2008-5-7 15:44:00 | 只看该作者

一个是主动,被动的问题。 而且原句的意思是转折在simplicity, c 的转折变成了complexity。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-7 23:16:00 | 只看该作者
看样子,这道题就主要是考察agreement和主被动关系?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 16:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部