请教大全692题即补充132题

nevia

分清a与c最简单的方法，就是a选项中with no commitment to m h and e p可能修饰主句中的fill,也可能修饰前面紧邻的名词action，

修饰主句中的fill时，说fill的时候没有做出相应承诺

修饰前面紧邻的名词action时，说fill了一个没有相应承诺的affirmative action quota

两种解释似乎都行得通，而句子的本意却只有一个，所以这种表达引起歧义，不能选这样的答案。

而c就没有这个毛病。

zhoushao

以下是引用nevia在2005-6-21 18:24:00的发言：

分清a与c最简单的方法，就是a选项中with no commitment to m h and e p可能修饰主句中的fill,也可能修饰前面紧邻的名词action，

修饰主句中的fill时，说fill的时候没有做出相应承诺

修饰前面紧邻的名词action时，说fill了一个没有相应承诺的affirmative action quota

两种解释似乎都行得通，而句子的本意却只有一个，所以这种表达引起歧义，不能选这样的答案。

而c就没有这个毛病。

我同意

还有我认为AB中的promoting应该是动名词，为名词性质，所以应该是eventual而不是adv形式

zhoushao

但是这样的话，怎么去辨别with的修饰呢，感觉怎么没有定论了呢

Avantasia

以下是引用JerryGuan在2004-3-25 2:11:00的发言：
with短语前无逗号，做定语优先修前面的名词。
另，提请注意：The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion.
it was meant merely to fill   只意味着充数。。。按常理上说应该是：it meant merely to fill,
但朗文上有：
be meant to do something
a) if you are meant to do something, you should do it, especially because someone has told you to or because you are responsible for it
Come on, Ellen, you're meant to be helping me. I thought the police were meant to protect people.
b) to be intended to do something
The diagram is meant to show the different stages of the process.

这些企业应该是：be intended to fill an affirmative action quota . 而不是：are responsible for an affirmative action quota

紫色部分说的我不是那么能接受, OG56C就是一个反例. without前面没有逗号, 做状语修饰整个句子.

我觉得这题发散出来的考点值得研究, 大家都在AC上面的with结构上面讨论, 其实要我选AB相较, B的伴随取消了with歧义, 比A更好, 我会在BC之间选. 我觉得排除的关键是动词"reflect".

看一个OG的题目可能就理解了:

214. Although the term "psychopath" is popularly applied to an especially brutal criminal, in psychology it is someone who is apparently inca­pable of feeling compassion or the pangs of conscience.

(A)  it is someone who is

(B)   it is a person

(C)  they are people who are

(D)  it refers to someone who is

(E)   it is in reference to people

In choices A and B, the pronoun it simultaneously refers forward to someone (or a person) and backward to the term "psychopath" As a result, the sentence asserts illogically that the term is actually a kind of person rather than a word referring to a kind of person. Choice C repeats this fault and adds an error in agreement: they (plural) does not agree in number with the term (singular). E omits a main verb, such as applied, that, in grammatical context here, is required after is. Also, the word people incorrectly shifts number from singular to plural. In choice D, the best answer, the verb refers is correctly used after it, and the alignment of pronouns and antecedents is both logical and grammatical.

OG说的明确, 主要动词是不可省略的, 推广一步, 下次再看到这种两个选项差在一个"实意"动词的时候, 应该小心了.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-9 7:33:07编辑过]

zhoushao

以下是引用Avantasia在2005-7-9 7:13:00的发言：

紫色部分说的我不是那么能接受, OG56C就是一个反例. without前面没有逗号, 做状语修饰整个句子.

我觉得这题发散出来的考点值得研究, 大家都在AC上面的with结构上面讨论, 其实要我选AB相较, B的伴随取消了with歧义, 比A更好, 我会在BC之间选. 我觉得排除的关键是动词"reflect".

看一个OG的题目可能就理解了:

214. Although the term "psychopath" is popularly applied to an especially brutal criminal, in psychology it is someone who is apparently inca­pable of feeling compassion or the pangs of conscience.

(A)  it is someone who is

(B)   it is a person

(C)  they are people who are

(D)  it refers to someone who is

(E)   it is in reference to people

In choices A and B, the pronoun it simultaneously refers forward to someone (or a person) and backward to the term "psychopath" As a result, the sentence asserts illogically that the term is actually a kind of person rather than a word referring to a kind of person. Choice C repeats this fault and adds an error in agreement: they (plural) does not agree in number with the term (singular). E omits a main verb, such as applied, that, in grammatical context here, is required after is. Also, the word people incorrectly shifts number from singular to plural. In choice D, the best answer, the verb refers is correctly used after it, and the alignment of pronouns and antecedents is both logical and grammatical.

OG说的明确, 主要动词是不可省略的, 推广一步, 下次再看到这种两个选项差在一个"实意"动词的时候, 应该小心了.

是啊，你说的很好

但是因为A项是原句，没有reflect,一般不敢随便加减动词，所以在A上我犹豫了半天

Avantasia

没有做过大全, 但是我想考点应该很多都是对应的.

哈佛情人

呼唤NN，怎样区别C和D阿？

我觉得C的Reflecting修饰Offer

kevin5

以下是引用哈佛情人在2006-7-17 23:42:00的发言：

呼唤NN，怎样区别C和D阿？

我觉得C的Reflecting修饰Offer

就像2楼所说，D中的not reflecting 的逻辑主语应该是主句主语，所以逻辑上有歧异，不好。

分词做状语的修饰对象一般不是通过逻辑判断出来的，而是遵循至少下列规则。

（然后用逻辑判断检验根据下列规则代入后的结果是否合乎逻辑）

1。主句的主语应该是分词动作的发起者（逻辑主语）

2。分词前的整个句子造成了分词的动作发生。一般这个时候分词部分作结果状语（或目的状语）

     ---〉 如：I got 200 points at GMAT test , leading to myselft losing face.

 -----

C选项就比较清楚了。GMAT中平行一般都是由内层扩展到外层来判断，先判断这里的reflect 和...to fill ...是平行吗？当然不，不定式的平行不是这个样子嘛！再往外层扩展是和...was meant ...平行吗？一看时态上都是一般过去没问题，心里一喜，再一看逻辑上也说得过去，于是大悦！恩。。。应该就是它了。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-18 9:46:24编辑过]

biss33

分词的修饰一般有三种情况，一是做定语修饰本句的主语（og39），这种用法相对少见。二是做状语，表示伴随动作。另外一种也是做状语表示伴随结果。后两种相对常见。做状语的时候是修饰整个句子或者主语。

具体到这道题明显是分词短语做状语修饰attorney或者整个句子。但是实际上我们需要的是一个可以和because句的宾语从句中与it was……平行的动作。所以d不对。

不知道讲清楚没有

allen0018

为什么没有人关注
a,b,minority hiring and eventually promoting

c,d   minority hiring and eventual promotion
的区别？
ab 中副词是不能修饰名次的，你要是说是v-ing 那就不平行