ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9861|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD25-Q16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-2-22 14:14:00 | 只看该作者

GWD25-Q16

A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A  using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B  the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C  cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million years, explaining hominid features like
D  fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E  fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

答案是B, 但我覺得"such hominid features as"應該為"hominid features such as".
Comment?
沙发
发表于 2008-2-22 15:47:00 | 只看该作者

such hominid features as 是ets很喜欢的形式哦

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-2-23 02:13:00 | 只看该作者
但是我以為such as是用來舉例子: such as 名詞, 名詞, and 名詞.
such [名詞] as [從句]是用從句來修飾such和as之間的名詞.
No?
地板
发表于 2008-2-23 08:57:00 | 只看该作者
一样的,没分别,都是举例
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-2-25 08:06:00 | 只看该作者
Just want to share what I found:
A GMAT instructor said that they are almost the same except that "such X as Y and Z" means that Y and Z are the primary example of X while "X such as Y and Z" means that Y and Z are just 2 random examples of X.
But he said that GMAT won't focus on such difference.
So yes, they are same in the GMAT sense =)
Thanks guys =)
6#
发表于 2008-12-7 17:13:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得这道题我不明白的是,到底是用火做饭explain了人类的特点,还是用火做饭很早(almost two million years)explain了人类的特点,其实我认为是后者,但是如果是这样的话,那答案B就不是很准确。应该答案D更好用一些。表达了后者的意思。请NN们指点!谢谢啦。

7#
发表于 2009-7-31 12:44:00 | 只看该作者

up

8#
发表于 2009-8-27 22:25:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用collins822在2008/12/7 17:13:00的发言:

我觉得这道题我不明白的是,到底是用火做饭explain了人类的特点,还是用火做饭很早(almost two million years)explain了人类的特点,其实我认为是后者,但是如果是这样的话,那答案B就不是很准确。应该答案D更好用一些。表达了后者的意思。请NN们指点!谢谢啦。

我觉得也是这个问题,我也认为是后者,选了D
9#
发表于 2009-8-27 22:40:00 | 只看该作者
貌似原文意思不能随便变得吧,新东方老师教我们说所有的选项最好跟A的意思基本一致,变了就不对了。
10#
发表于 2009-10-31 23:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用zanyingsan在2009/8/27 22:25:00的发言:

我觉得也是这个问题,我也认为是后者,选了D

D 选项用了 fire (used to cook food 定语) could date back... 逻辑上不对。 date back 的是 火的使用,而不是 火(名词)。而且窃以为 explaining 于句末做伴随有歧义,究竟是伴随 date back? 还是伴随 propose ?

因此还是 B 好。逻辑准确,并列平行,无歧义。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-20 20:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部