烧香烧出来的惨痛阅读结果。。

逆风居士

Test	Test Date	Reading	Listening	Speaking	Writing	Total
TELXML	October 27, 2007	5	15	18	17	55

How to interpret scores?

Reading  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Reading	Low(0-14)	Test takers who receive a score at the LOW level, as you did, typically understand some of the information presented in academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities, but their understanding is limited. Test takers who receive a score at the LOW level typically have a command of basic academic vocabulary, but their understanding of less common vocabulary is inconsistent; have limited ability to understand and connect information, have difficulty recognizing paraphrases of text information, and often rely on particular words and phrases rather than a complete understanding of the text; have difficulty identifying the author's purpose, except when that purpose is explicitly stated in the text or easy to infer from the text; and can sometimes recognize major ideas from a text when the information is clearly presented, memorable, or illustrated by examples but have difficulty doing so when the text is more demanding.
Listening  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Listening	Intermediate(14-21)	Test takers who receive a score at the INTERMEDIATE level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, and/or abstract or complex ideas. However, lectures and conversations that require the listener to make sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information may present some difficulty. When listening to conversations and lectures like these, test takers at the INTERMEDIATE level typically can understand explicitly stated main ideas and important details, especially if they are reinforced, but may have difficulty understanding main ideas that must be inferred or important details that are not reinforced; understand how information is being used (for example, to provide support or describe a step in a complex process); recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship); understand, though perhaps not consistently, ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and synthesize information from adjacent parts of a lecture or conversation and make correct inferences on the basis of that information, but may have difficulty synthesizing information from separate parts of a lecture or conversation.
Speaking  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Speaking about familiar topics	Fair(2.5 - 3.0)	Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about your personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and coherent manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only occasional errors. Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat limited and include some errors. At times, the limitations prevent you from elaborating fully on your ideas, but they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.
Speaking about campus situations	Limited(1.5 - 2.0)	Your responses indicate that you have some difficulty speaking in English about information from conversations, newspaper articles, university publications, and so on. While you are able to talk about some of the key information from these sources, limited grammar and vocabulary may prevent you from fully expressing your ideas. Problems with pronunciation make it difficult for listeners to understand you at times.
Speaking about academic course content	Fair(2.5 - 3.0)	Your responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in English about academic reading and lecture material, with only minor communication problems. For the most part, your speech is clear and easy to understand. However, some problems with pronunciation and intonation may occasionally cause difficulty for the listener. Your use of grammar and vocabulary is adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are not fully developed or are inaccurate.
Writing  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Writing based on reading and listening	Limited(1.0 - 2.0)	Your response was judged as limited due to failure to understand the lecture or reading passage; deficiencies in relating the lecture to the reading passage; and/or many grammatical errors and/or very unclear expressions and sentence structures.
Writing based on knowledge and experience	Fair(2.5 - 3.5)	You expressed ideas with reasons, examples, and details, but your response indicated weaknesses such as you may not provide enough specific support and development for your main points; your ideas may be difficult to follow because of how you organize your essay or because of the language you use to connect your ideas; and/or grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.

逆风居士

阅读我加苏梅尔没有好好做

和这个有关系么？

我觉得可能还是自己前面的文章看不懂的原因。。。

谁能帮帮我？

别人成绩都满意

就这个阅读

要是25我就能去好学校了

逆风居士

我的阅读基础上次是15

这次5

说明我真有问题

还是运气不幸运，灾在这次比较难的了？

我十八岁

troyxu

俄。。幸灾乐祸中。。18岁有啥好说的？n多大牛18-都考到115+！

逆风居士

我的意思怎么自己和别人差距那么大阿

53211yf

兄弟比我还惨呀，我也18岁，10月27考了62，阅读14，听力/口语15，远低于实际水平。貌似27/28号的让无数的同志黯然神伤

逆风居士

是不是因为题目普遍难的缘故？

后来几次的战友

你们觉得还这么难么

Daffi

以下是引用逆风居士在2007-11-13 21:30:00的发言：

我的阅读基础上次是15

这次5

说明我真有问题

还是运气不幸运，灾在这次比较难的了？

我十八岁

阅读15分的话, 那恐怕你是真的没看懂文章.

基础不扎实, 就算到了美国也很融入那儿的校园生活.

阅读从5分到25分是一个质的区别. 不用幻想什么"栽在这次比较难的" 上面.  从27分到25分, 这叫考栽了. 从15分到5分, 这只能说明你实力不够. 路还很长.

53211yf

楼上的兄弟也太狠了吧，阅读27和25只是1-2题的差距，怎么能叫考栽了呢？题难肯定会引起连锁反应，影响的肯定多于4-5题

逆风居士

为什么15芬也没读懂呢？

一半了已经。。