- UID
- 185788
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-29
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
急问：需不需要复议。。
|
急问：需不需要复议。。 Writing 8月考的时候25，SAT 11分（满分12）这分实在是巨恶。。 11/11还去考过一次。感觉比这回好多了。 还有speaking 我怎么的也不会limited吧。。。 还请高人指点。。
| Test | Test Date | Reading | Listening | Speaking | Writing | Total | | TELXML | October 27, 2007 | 23 | 26 | 22 | 22 | 93 |
| Reading Skills | Level | Your Performance | | Reading | High(22-30) | Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts. Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically - have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;
- can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex;
- can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and
- can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
| | Listening Skills | Level | Your Performance | | Listening | High(22-30) | Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information. When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can - understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied;
- distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
- understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
- recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
- understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
- synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
| | Speaking Skills | Level | Your Performance | | Speaking about familiar topics | Good(3.5 - 4.0) | Your responses indicate an ability to communicate your personal experiences and opinions effectively in English. Overall, your speech is clear and fluent. Your use of vocabulary and grammar is effective with only minor errors. Your ideas are generally well developed and expressed coherently. | | Speaking about campus situations | Fair(2.5 - 3.0) | Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading material and experiences typically encountered by university students. You are able to convey relevant information about conversations, newspaper articles, and campus bulletins; however, some details are missing or inaccurate. Limitations of grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation at times cause difficulty for the listener. However, they do not seriously interfere with overall communication. | | Speaking about academic course content | Limited(1.5 - 2.0) | In your responses, you are able to use English to talk about the basic ideas from academic reading or lecture materials, but, in general, you include few relevant or accurate details. It is sometimes difficult for listeners to understand your responses because of problems with grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation. Overall, you are able to respond in a general way to the questions, but the amount of information in your responses is limited and the expression of ideas is often vague and unclear. | | Writing Skills | Level | Your Performance | | Writing based on reading and listening | Fair(2.5 - 3.5) | You responded to the task, relating the lecture to the reading, but your response indicates weaknesses such as - an important idea or ideas may be missing, unclear, or inaccurate;
- there may be unclarity in how the lecture and the reading passage are related; and/or
- grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.
| | Writing based on knowledge and experience | Good(4.0 - 5.0) | You responded with a well-organized and developed essay. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with - use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical, unclear, or unidiomatic and/or
- elaboration of ideas or connection of ideas that could have been stronger.
|
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2007-11-13 15:45:00
发表于 2007-11-13 16:02:00
楼主
