ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: xuehanfei
打印 上一主题 下一主题

说个背景,恳请大家给出建议

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2007-10-1 15:10:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用xuehanfei在2007-10-1 9:54:00的发言:

AMOS;
I am interested in non-market strategy(political strategy), KM and Innovation. 

With papers presented at AoM (especially for regular paper sessions), you have good chances to get into decent programs. I think you can try to target 30-50 schools. You may also want to apply for some top 15-30 schools, and probably with a few safe bets that range between 50-70.

So you are using social network, resource dependence theory, new institutional theory, learning perspective and/or RBV?

When writing SOPs, you would probably want to state the major theories you have been drawing on to show the admission committees that you know how to use appropriate theories to inspect the empirical phenomenon that you're interested in. Of course, some poeple are theory-driven while some others are phenomenon- or question-driven; if you fall into the later category, you don't have to stick to some specific theoretical frameworks, but at any rate it would be a plus to let the schools know that you know which theories would be good for which types of phenomenon and why.

Moreover, it should be a big plus to stress the fact that you have had solid statistics training and that you can actually do (even better, you have done) good empirical research.

Good luck!

12#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-10-1 15:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用jadelo在2007-10-1 15:10:00的发言:

With papers presented at AoM (especially for regular paper sessions), you have good chances to get into decent programs. I think you can try to target 30-50 schools. You may also want to apply for some top 15-30 schools, and probably with a few safe bets that range between 50-70.

So you are using social network, resource dependence theory, new institutional theory, learning perspective and/or RBV?

When writing SOPs, you would probably want to state the major theories you have been drawing on to show the admission committees that you know how to use appropriate theories to inspect the empirical phenomenon that you're interested in. Of course, some poeple are theory-driven while some others are phenomenon- or question-driven; if you fall into the later category, you don't have to stick to some specific theoretical frameworks, but at any rate it would be a plus to let the schools know that you know which theories would be good for which types of phenomenon and why.

Moreover, it should be a big plus to stress the fact that you have had solid statistics training and that you can actually do (even better, you have done) good empirical research.

Good luck!

感谢你给出如此详实的建议!非常感谢!

13#
发表于 2007-10-4 03:14:00 | 只看该作者
楼上的楼上厉害啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 14:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部