ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1154|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]关于seem的问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-18 09:26:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]关于seem的问题

请问seem to be+ 名词的to be需要省略吗
沙发
发表于 2007-7-18 17:48:00 | 只看该作者

总的来说我觉得不用,不过LZ是针对某些题目的话把题发上来在讨论一下会更有把握

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-18 21:45:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢~~~

题目是这样的:

Seeming to be the only organization fighting for the rights of poor people in the South,Hosea Hudson, a laborer in Alabama, joined the Communist party in 1931.

A.Seeming to be

B.As

C.In that they seemed

D.Since it seemed

E.Because it seemed to be

感觉就是D和E搞不清楚选哪个。。。

地板
发表于 2007-7-19 05:29:00 | 只看该作者

OG认为to be是需要的呵呵

Choice A and B wrongly identify Hosea Hudson, not the communist party, as the organization under discussion. In choice C, the plural pronoun they does not agree in number with the singular noun party. In that in C and Since in D are less direct and idiomatic than Because in this context, and to be is needed to complete the predicate begun by seemed. E is the correct answer for this question of middle difficulty

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-20 12:33:00 | 只看该作者
恩~~谢谢各位^_^
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-10 14:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部