请教GWD25-18

llxx1985cn

（1）     GWD-25-Q18

In contrast to environmentalist’s proposals to limit emissions of certain pollutants, the administration proposed calling for mandatory restrictions of only three such pollutants from power plants-mercury, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides-and the plan would delay such cuts until 2010 or later.

A.     administration proposed calling for mandatory restriction of

B.     administration proposed a call for mandatory restrictions, including those for

C.    administration, proposing mandatory restrictions on

D.    administration’s proposal was a call for mandatory restrictions, which include

E.     administration’s proposal would call for mandatory restrictions on

 

 

答案是E, D为什么不可以呢

E中为什么要用would呢

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-7 15:24:43编辑过]

raikey

与后面的the plan would delay such cuts until 2010 or later平行

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-7 15:27:25编辑过]

s7s7

补充楼上 ：a call for 不如动词表达有效；, which include 罗嗦

missilezy

D中restrictions, which include three such pollutants...不符合逻辑意思，不能说restriction包括三个污染物

yzhao26

up

rorarora

反正这里贸贸然的用would让我觉得有点怪异，不过为了保持并列，没办法啦。

xiaoda

up

夜凉如水

没有注意到后文用了would 事后想想 这里用非限制定语从句也不妥吧

jane110

不会有ＲＵＮ－ＯＮ　错误产生吗？如果选E

岳如初

仅仅因为与后面平行的原因选E吗？完全没有必要阿

上面其他的解释都不是致命的错误吧……

不理解