ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1197|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创]5月18日很不好的分数,顺便转让6月16北京工商的考试

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-7 09:27:00 | 只看该作者

[原创]5月18日很不好的分数,顺便转让6月16北京工商的考试

5 18报分

一个很好不好的分数,我还报了6月16的,但最近感觉没怎么复习

请高手指点一下该如何复习?6月16的还有必要考吗

Test Test Date Reading Listening Speaking Writing Total
TELXMLMay 18, 200725 14 6 12 57
How to interpret scores?
 




Reading  Skills Level  Your Performance  
ReadingHigh(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts.

Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically

  • have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;
  • can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex;
  • can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and
  • can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
 
Listening  Skills Level  Your Performance  
ListeningIntermediate(14-21)

Test takers who receive a score at the INTERMEDIATE level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, and/or abstract or complex ideas. However, lectures and conversations that require the listener to make sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information may present some difficulty.

When listening to conversations and lectures like these, test takers at the INTERMEDIATE level typically can

  • understand explicitly stated main ideas and important details, especially if they are reinforced, but may have difficulty understanding main ideas that must be inferred or important details that are not reinforced;
  • understand how information is being used (for example, to provide support or describe a step in a complex process);
  • recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
  • understand, though perhaps not consistently, ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
  • synthesize information from adjacent parts of a lecture or conversation and make correct inferences on the basis of that information, but may have difficulty synthesizing information from separate parts of a lecture or conversation.
 
Speaking  Skills Level  Your Performance  
Speaking about familiar topicsLimited(1.5 - 2.0)

Your responses indicate some difficulty speaking in English about everyday experiences and opinions. Listeners sometimes have trouble understanding you because of noticeable problems with pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary. While you are able to respond partially to the questions, you are not able to fully develop your ideas, possibly due to limited vocabulary and grammar.

 
Speaking about campus situationsWeak(0 - 1.0)

Your responses are incomplete. They include little or no information about the topic. Your speech is often difficult for listeners to understand, and the meaning is unclear.

 
Speaking about academic course contentWeak(0 - 1.0)

Your responses are incomplete. They include little or no information about the topic. Your speech is often difficult for listeners to understand, and the meaning is unclear.

 
Writing  Skills Level  Your Performance  
Writing based on reading and listeningLimited(1.0 - 2.0)

Your response was judged as limited due to

  • failure to understand the lecture or reading passage;
  • deficiencies in relating the lecture to the reading passage; and/or
  • many grammatical errors and/or very unclear expressions and sentence structures.
 
Writing based on knowledge and experienceFair(2.5 - 3.5)

You expressed ideas with reasons, examples, and details, but your response indicated weaknesses such as

  • you may not provide enough specific support and development for your main points;
  • your ideas may be difficult to follow because of how you organize your essay or because of the language you use to connect your ideas; and/or
  • grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.
 
沙发
发表于 2007-6-7 09:31:00 | 只看该作者

如果写作是1-2分,证明你的英语基础十分的差,并不是听力或者口语不好才导致这样的低分

所以,我建议你6.16不要盲目参考,退了吧

板凳
发表于 2007-6-7 10:25:00 | 只看该作者
兄弟,你听力不太好吧?我也是同样的问题。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-29 10:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部