ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2135|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于非限制性定语从句修饰对象的疑惑?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-23 18:03:00 | 只看该作者

关于非限制性定语从句修饰对象的疑惑?

A attempt to ratify the Equal Right Amendment, begun almost two decades ago, has been unsuccessful despite efforts by many important groups, including the National Organization for Women.
A)to ratify the Equal Right Amendment, begun almost two decades ago,
B)begun almost two decades ago, for retifying the Equal Right Amendment
C)begun for retifying the Equal Right Amendment almost two decades ago
D)at retifying the Equal Right Amendment,begun almost two decades ago,
E)that has begun almost two decades ago to retify the Equal Right Amendment
这里答案选A。疑惑的是begun almost two decades ago所修饰的应该是attempt吧,而非限制性定语从句不是应该紧跟其所修饰的对象吗?按照A的说法,begun almost two decades ago就应该修饰the Equal Right Amendment了。搞不懂,非限制性定语从句可以跃前修饰吗?
沙发
发表于 2007-4-23 19:30:00 | 只看该作者

,which与that/which区别是它与前面的名词关系不紧密,是addtional information,can be drop out.这里which指代的是a attempt.如果用that/which要紧跟所修饰名词的后面,所以这里用了,which.

不过n1 of n2 which/that并不能判断指代谁,要从从句的语法上避免误会。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 20:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部