燕雀鸿鹄各有志, 长江放眼大风流

davidli8888

以下是引用mba3000在2007-4-12 11:25:00的发言：

I believe that high quality MBA applicants with independent thinking will not use ranking as an important indicator if they get the chance to go to info sessions, talk to alums and check information about faculty, curriculumn, and placement. The success of the MBA graduates from CK is a stronger indicator than ranking. It also suggests that right now CK is attracting top quality applicants in China.

International students may put more weight on ranking, as their information source is limited. That may explain why the proportion of international students at CK is about 15% (including Asian students from Korea, Singapore, Japan). The proportion of European and American students is even less.

I also hope that CK will attract more international students in the future. I suppose that CK is working in this direction.

" believe that high quality MBA applicants with independent thinking will not use ranking as an important indicator if they get the chance to go to info sessions, talk to alums and check information about faculty, curriculumn, and placement."

That is how marketing works. Remember the alternatives out there, the competition for the top quality applicants across the world.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-12 12:16:03编辑过]

foever

说句实话，长江比我想象得好，无论教授、同学、课程、业余生活等，当时很多条件肯定不如现在。一所好的商学院会给你不少意外的收获，只有经历了才能感受到，从这点讲，语言是无力的，我们能做的只能到这个程度了，长江不少人也去看过了。大的决策其实很容易，几个重要条件满足就够了，我准备长江的申请前后只一周时间，等各种条件和期望都满足了，机会通常也错过了。况且很多风险我们前几届都承担了、试验过了，不少知名华人教授把他们的声誉压在了长江，他们本可以有其他选择。

davidli8888

Thanks. I can feel the passion alumni and current students have for their alma mater. And I believe in the value in the MBA at CK. I will apply in due course this year, and wish we could become friends.

foever

以下是引用davidli8888在2007-4-12 12:37:00的发言：

Thanks. I can feel the passion alumni and current students have for their alma mater. And I believe in the value in the MBA at CK. I will apply in due course this year, and wish we could become friends.

Welcome!

benu365

根据我的理解，长江不是不排名，是想要排就来个一鸣惊人，我期待这一天，不管我能不能去长江。长江对于排名的计划就像我们考GMAT一样，准备考750分的NN，现在水平已经710左右，但是暂时还是不会去考，明知道和750还有距离，不会贸然去试，现在还是安心复习为好。
我也很喜欢中欧，但是对他的名字耿耿于怀，:-)感觉像西欧与东欧之间哪个国家的学校，不知道一百年以后他会叫什么名字，长江亲切些！我好象说的都是一些无关痛痒的事情。

tingyun

GMat710和750只是临场发挥的一点点差别，呵呵

seanbb

以下是引用benu365在2007-4-12 17:18:00的发言：
根据我的理解，长江不是不排名，是想要排就来个一鸣惊人，我期待这一天，不管我能不能去长江。长江对于排名的计划就像我们考GMAT一样，准备考750分的NN，现在水平已经710左右，但是暂时还是不会去考，明知道和750还有距离，不会贸然去试，现在还是安心复习为好。
我也很喜欢中欧，但是对他的名字耿耿于怀，:-)感觉像西欧与东欧之间哪个国家的学校，不知道一百年以后他会叫什么名字，长江亲切些！我好象说的都是一些无关痛痒的事情。

我也这么想, 感觉长江的要不参加排名, 要参加就希望拿个比较高的. 中欧串到11名给长江压力应该满大的.

现在大家感觉长江,中欧差不多, 如果长江参加排名, 拿了个80-90名, 大家突然发现原来和中欧排名差这么多啊.而且对于新学校来说, 刚参加排名这也是很有可能发生的. 比如新加坡的NUS和NTU在本地人眼里差不多, NTU的起薪还高点.但参加大学排名, NUS前50, NTU排200..嘿嘿

所以长江索性避开直接竞争, 不排名, 踏实把学校办好,等待合适的时机. 这也是可以理解的. 你比我高, 我比你快呒..

MLG

seanbb 跟项院长的战略思路一样,站在月球看地球啊.

tingyun

俺觉得长江如果参加排名不可能只有80，90名。毕竟加权工资以内工资涨幅这两个权重大头摆在这里，这两个可是大陆商学院的杀手锏，呵呵

davidli8888

以下是引用tingyun在2007-4-12 19:33:00的发言：
GMat710和750只是临场发挥的一点点差别，呵呵

Do you really believe so? A difference in 40 points is too big to be accountable for by 临场发挥.