3.24 成绩78，征求意见如何尽快提高？5.12再考

wd_zyh

我当时考前复习情况如下：
单词只背了李笑来的（很多依然不懂），没学过王玉梅的
OG看了前面50页及后面对每一部分中文简介
看了李笑来前面10篇作文，还没练过作文
口语只看了点模板

考前晚上上ETS看了一下考试界面，熟悉了一下
成绩如下，不好!  已经继续准备5.12二战。

因为时间很短，请问如何复习能较快提高成绩？谢谢指点

现在我正在背王玉梅的单词，也开始做点delta的阅读题

3.24成绩如下：

Test	Test Date	Reading	Listening	Speaking	Writing	Total
TELXML	March 24, 2007	19	24	18	17	78

How to interpret scores?

Reading  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Reading	Intermediate(15-21)	Test takers who receive a score at the INTERMEDIATE level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities, although their understanding of certain parts of the texts is limited. Test takers who receive a score at the INTERMEDIATE level typically have a good command of common academic vocabulary but still have some difficulty with high-level vocabulary; have a very good understanding of grammatical structure; can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize information in a range of texts but have more difficulty when the vocabulary is high level and the text is conceptually dense; can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within a larger text but have some difficulty when these are not explicit or easy to infer from the text; and can abstract major ideas from a text but have more difficulty doing so when the text is conceptually dense.
Listening  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Listening	High(22-30)	Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information. When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied; distinguish more important ideas from less important ones; understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process); recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship); understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
Speaking  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Speaking about familiar topics	Limited(1.5 - 2.0)	Your responses indicate some difficulty speaking in English about everyday experiences and opinions. Listeners sometimes have trouble understanding you because of noticeable problems with pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary. While you are able to respond partially to the questions, you are not able to fully develop your ideas, possibly due to limited vocabulary and grammar.
Speaking about campus situations	Limited(1.5 - 2.0)	Your responses indicate that you have some difficulty speaking in English about information from conversations, newspaper articles, university publications, and so on. While you are able to talk about some of the key information from these sources, limited grammar and vocabulary may prevent you from fully expressing your ideas. Problems with pronunciation make it difficult for listeners to understand you at times.
Speaking about academic course content	Fair(2.5 - 3.0)	Your responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in English about academic reading and lecture material, with only minor communication problems. For the most part, your speech is clear and easy to understand. However, some problems with pronunciation and intonation may occasionally cause difficulty for the listener. Your use of grammar and vocabulary is adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are not fully developed or are inaccurate.
Writing  Skills	Level	Your Performance
Writing based on reading and listening	Limited(1.0 - 2.0)	Your response was judged as limited due to failure to understand the lecture or reading passage; deficiencies in relating the lecture to the reading passage; and/or many grammatical errors and/or very unclear expressions and sentence structures.
Writing based on knowledge and experience	Fair(2.5 - 3.5)	You expressed ideas with reasons, examples, and details, but your response indicated weaknesses such as you may not provide enough specific support and development for your main points; your ideas may be difficult to follow because of how you organize your essay or because of the language you use to connect your ideas; and/or grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.

jessica021

考试前没有做过题目吗?

squareb

要多熟悉口语和写作

Aurora0318

怎么这么快就出来了？　我去看看　我２３号大陆的