ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3797|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

high GMAT practice 8/20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-4-15 22:33:00 | 只看该作者

high GMAT practice 8/20

Not until the Enlightenment, some 200 years ago, (had society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute) its citizens.
A: had society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute
B: did society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute
C: had society seriously questioned the right of the state for the executing of
D: did society seriously questioned the right of the state to execute
E: had society seriously questioned whether the state had a right that it could execute

Answer: D,
请问如何排除B, 我觉得B和原文的语气一致,比D好。

沙发
发表于 2003-4-16 04:17:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Robin在2003-4-15 22:33:00的发言:
Not until the Enlightenment, some 200 years ago, (had society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute) its citizens.
A: had society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute
B: did society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute
C: had society seriously questioned the right of the state for the executing of
D: did society seriously questioned the right of the state to execute
E: had society seriously questioned whether the state had a right that it could execute
Answer: D,
请问如何排除B, 我觉得B和原文的语气一致,比D好。


D: the right of (the state to execute its citizens):国家处死公民的权利。
B: that-clause是什么从句颇费思量。
如果是定语从句就近修饰STATE,则it似显多余,that不知做何成分在从句中。
如果是同位于从句,无论同位state还是right, it都指代不清。
板凳
发表于 2003-4-16 12:26:00 | 只看该作者
当两个“虚词”连用的时候,比如that it 可以看看that 和it是否在句子中充当合理的成分,如果其一充当成分使得另一个不能有合理的成分,必错!
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-4-16 12:34:00 | 只看该作者
I got it.
thanks
5#
发表于 2003-4-16 18:41:00 | 只看该作者
同意1stzhang兄观点。呵呵,B中的that it 在TOEFL中叫主语重复。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 05:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部