ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 949|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一題語法

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-3-16 13:52:00 | 只看该作者

请教一題語法

Despite the increasing popularity among financial analysts of "operating cash flow" as a measure of a company's viability, a combination of six more conventional measures has been shown to be more accurate to predict business failure.

(A)has been shown to be more accurate to predict business failure

(B)has been shown to predit business failure more accurately

AnswerB)

Why is (A) wrong?

是不是(A)要改成 has been shown to be more accurately to predict business failure

還是有其他(A)的改法??

謝謝

沙发
发表于 2007-3-16 14:48:00 | 只看该作者

has been shown to be more accurate in predicting business failure

总觉得第2个to用的不太舒服,这里好象没有表目的的意思

LZ的改法我不太认同,n. be more adv.

板凳
发表于 2007-3-16 20:55:00 | 只看该作者

has been shown 已经是被动了 后面的to be more accurate 又是被动

B的主动优于被动 ,而且句子更简洁

个人观点

地板
发表于 2007-3-16 21:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fionajiang在2007-3-16 14:48:00的发言:

has been shown to be more accurate in predicting business failure

总觉得第2个to用的不太舒服,这里好象没有表目的的意思

LZ的改法我不太认同,n. be more adv.

同意fiona的观点
in doing sth 表示 during the act or process of ...
5#
发表于 2007-3-17 02:41:00 | 只看该作者
题目用has been shown, 觉得has shown也可以,请指教
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-25 14:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部