ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1150|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

班门弄斧一下~[灌水]

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-3-9 23:51:00 | 只看该作者

班门弄斧一下~[灌水]

和众多GG、MM一样,偶也在备战,AWA实在没底,练习了几篇,也没个改进方向,苦闷……

在这里献丑了,希望大虾们有时间题写意见来噢,谢谢!

Essay:

In the statement, the speaker asserts that it should be each individual person rather than government that the responsibility for preserving the natural environment should ultimately belong to. In my view, individuals actually play an irreplaceable role in the preservation of the micro environment, yet the government is on the primary duty of preservation of the macro environment, consequently, bringing   much greater influences.

 Judging from our experiences, the methods used to preserve the natural environment could be abstractly described as “big ones” (like the environmental project in China’s developing of the west) or, in contrary, “small ones” (such as clean your garden). When an empty rolling can stops by your foot, it can’t be easier for you to pick it up and threw it into garbage. But you just have cleaned a very limited area compared to the whole country. That’s “small ones”.
            
Extended to the whole country, suppose that, a nation wants to explore part of its landtake China as an example without a intention to do harm to the environment there , what is a separate person able to do then? In this situation, one of the reasonable ways is starting an environmental project that relies on the financial capacity and technical power of government. Obviously, the project will influence the country very much. That’s “big ones”.

Further, though everyone would wish a tidy and wonderful living environment while confronted with the conflict between personal interest and environment protection, by and large, people would rather sacrifice the latter . What’s worse, someone even might do something profitable regardless of the harms it will bring to our environment. When this happens, it will be necessary for government to stop it in legal methods based on the nation’s power and force.

In total analysis, I concur that it was government that should take the primary responsibility for preservation of the natural environment, while individuals take subordinate ones.     

                       
沙发
发表于 2007-3-10 14:44:00 | 只看该作者

Essay:

In the statement, the speaker asserts that it should be each individual person, rather than government that 这里好像不对,that什么作用呢?the responsibility for preserving the natural environment should ultimately belong to. In my view, individuals actually play an irreplaceable role in the preservation of the micro environment, yet the government is on the primary duty of preservation of the macro environment, consequently, bringing   much greater influences.

 Judging from our 少用第一人称 experiences, the methods used to preserve the natural environment could be abstractly described as “big ones” (like the environmental project in China’s developing of the west) or, in contrary, “small ones” (such as clean your garden). When an empty rolling can stops by your foot, it can’t be easier for you 少用第二人称 to pick it up and threw it into garbage. But you just have cleaned a very limited area compared to the whole country. That’s “small ones”. Extended to the whole country, suppose that, a nation wants to explore part of its land(take China as an example )without a intention to do harm to the environment there , what is a separate person able to do then? In this situation, one of the reasonable ways is starting an environmental project that relies on the financial capacity and technical power of government. Obviously, the project will influence the country very much. That’s “big ones”.

Further, though everyone would wish a tidy and wonderful living environment ,while confronted with the conflict between personal interest and environment protection, by and large, people would rather sacrifice the latter . What’s worse, someone even might do something profitable regardless of the harms it will bring to our environment. When this happens, it will be necessary for government to stop it in legal methods based on the nation’s power and force.

让步段落没有

In total analysis 没见过这样的,好像, I concur that it was ?? government that should take the primary responsibility for preservation of the natural environment, while individuals take subordinate ones.     

                      

板凳
发表于 2007-3-10 22:15:00 | 只看该作者

LZ is so lucky~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-6 11:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部