ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 雨薇
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-26-Q17看过讨论依旧不明白,求助

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2008-1-9 13:35:00 | 只看该作者

I support D

1) "for" can also indicate purpose. EG. A Grant for studying medicine.

However, I am not sure whether "for" can be used in this case.

2) I think C is redundant because "will be to" is awkward. should be changed to "will collide"

3) I think E is also wrong because "likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may collide with earth" reader maybe confused and think that Likelihood will collide with Earth.

12#
发表于 2009-7-11 10:15:00 | 只看该作者
up
13#
发表于 2009-7-11 10:16:00 | 只看该作者
到底选什么...c还是d?
14#
发表于 2009-7-18 12:49:00 | 只看该作者

support c


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/7/18 12:49:49编辑过]
15#
发表于 2009-8-26 20:48:00 | 只看该作者

谁能帮我解释下E为什么不对呢? 就是因为likelihood和may语义重复吗?

我想确认一下

谢谢~

16#
发表于 2009-8-27 23:17:00 | 只看该作者
up
17#
发表于 2009-10-25 17:38:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ashura在2008/1/9 12:02:00的发言:

搜索了一下,原句引自1999年的NY times

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E6DF1E3EF934A15754C0A96F958260

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

看样子E最好。只有最后的may和原句的will不同。

E 是不对的,the
            
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may... 同位语从句明显缺少了动词,最后的一个 that 将likelihood 的动词变成comet定语从句的谓语,因此不可选

18#
发表于 2009-10-25 17:55:00 | 只看该作者

这题我目前倾向选 C

to rate 优于 for rating,而且 will be (how) likely to do 的表达也十分常用

但对 D 存有疑问

rate the likelihood 的表达是否固定搭配,也就是说 rate the likelihood 是否优于 rate how likely

因为 rate 是估计、估值的意思,计算出一个具体的比率(likelihood)语义上说是优于计算出“多大可能”

希望大家继续讨论啊

19#
发表于 2009-10-25 18:53:00 | 只看该作者

C中的how likely will be是固定搭配will be likely to的倒装。强调前面的内容,故将how likely提前,be必须补出。另外用不定式来表示目地符合GMAC语言习惯。

(eg, Participants for the current study were presented with restaurant menus and asked to rate how likely they would be to eat at each restaurant.)

D中用for rating肯定从语法上是正确的:下面是几个GMAC的原句:

Although the government or industry usually sets minimum standards for transportation industries, no such standard has been set for qualifying to be an engineer on the train.

The data collected by weather airplanes that fly into the heart of a hurricane are useful mainly for gauging the storm’s structure and strength, not for the speed and the path of their movement.

Although some officials noted that using machines for farming in China costs more than traditional hand cultivation,...

但这里我认为选C,因为how likely明显能感觉到强烈的感情色彩。和前面的public’s fascination with-and sometimes

undue alarm over-possible threats 照应。表示出作者对这样的公众反应的态度,及问题的关心。而D,非常学术化的语言,不太能跟本句的感情对应。

undue alarm over-possible threats 照应。表示出作者对这样的公众反应的态度,及问题的关心。而D,非常学术化的语言,不太能跟本句的感情对应。


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/25 18:55:02编辑过]
20#
发表于 2009-12-9 16:10:50 | 只看该作者

搜索了一下,原句引自1999年的NY times

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E6DF1E3EF934A15754C0A96F958260

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

看样子E最好。只有最后的may和原句的will不同。
-- by 会员 ashura (2008/1/9 12:02:00)



从原文可以看出, a scale that rates the likelihood that  a particular asteroid or comet will collide with earth,也就是说,在这个地方是在用一个定语从句修饰a scale,而非表明用这个scale的目的,所以用C.to rate how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to是没有必要的,相反,用D中的 for rating the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will来表修饰就刚刚合适了,所以我还是支持D
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-20 20:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部