ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted pedestrians right-of-way.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3014|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD8-Q23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-3-7 09:37:00 | 只看该作者

GWD8-Q23

A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted pedestrians right-of-way.

 

  1. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted

  2. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, granting

  3. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted

  4. regulating the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring of cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted

  5. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted

答案选E,但是我觉得这边",and"不妥吧.因为 OG里面说",and"是连句子的啊,哪位大侠能帮忙解答呢?谢谢!!!EG:OG135的解释里面对",and"有说明的

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-7 19:53:00 | 只看该作者
为什么没人回我啊?5555555
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-8 09:50:00 | 只看该作者
自己顶
地板
发表于 2007-3-8 10:25:00 | 只看该作者

我怎么看不出and一定要连句子啊?and可以连接两个动词的。此题结构为,

A New York City ordinance of 1897 , required...and granted...

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-8 15:50:00 | 只看该作者

对啊,连2动词结构不用逗号的

用逗号的话要后面是句子,OG上说的.

所以我搞不清楚这题了

6#
发表于 2007-3-8 16:16:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ltw724在2007-3-8 15:50:00的发言:

对啊,连2动词结构不用逗号的

用逗号的话要后面是句子,OG上说的.

所以我搞不清楚这题了

这个怎么可能呢,你说的连2动词大概后一动词是ing的吧,或者是伴随状态的,这个时候才不用and

不然动词和动词之间当然要用and连接

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-9 20:15:00 | 只看该作者

135. Intar, the oldest Hispanic theater company in New York, has moved away from the Spanish classics and now it draws on the works both of contemporary Hispanic authors who live abroad and of those in
                    
the United States.

(A)  now it draws on the works both of contemporary Hispanic authors who live abroad and of

(B)   now draws on the works of contemporary Hispanic authors, both those who live abroad and those who live

(C)  it draws on the works of contemporary Hispanic authors now, both those living abroad
                    
and who live

(D)  draws now on the works both of contemporary Hispanic authors living abroad and who are

(E)   draws on the works now of both contemporary Hispanic authors living abroad and those


In choices A and C, it intrudes between the halves of the compound verb has moved... and [now] draws to introduce a new grammatical subject, thereby creating a run-on sentence:the inclusion of it requires a comma after classics to set off the new independent clause (以此类推,and 连接并列句,如果第二句中出现主语的话,则and前一定要有逗号隔开)所以是说AC这里的it多余.
            
The placement of now is awkward in C
状语位置导致笨拙), and the construction living abroad... and who is not parallel in C and D.
                        Misplacement of words creates ambiguity in E: for example, the positioning of both immediately before the phrase describing the authors suggests that there are only two contemporary Hispanic authors living abroad (E
从并列的角度去讲也不是很好). The logical word placement and parallel phrasing of
                
B, the best choice, resolve such confusions.

Both E中出现的歧义还是要非常小心,因为both…and…本身就是一个经常考的词组。Now的位置在B中也是最好,最清晰的。

不是and不能连2动词,我的意思是如OG所说,and连句子时前面要有逗号.可是GWD这道题目却不是这样的.谁能解释一下么?到底是什么情况

8#
发表于 2007-3-9 20:20:00 | 只看该作者

135题中and之所以要加逗号是因为and后面增加了主语it,成为了一个新的句子,因此需要用逗号隔开.

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-9 23:24:00 | 只看该作者

o ...是不是要成立新的句子就得加逗号

但加了逗号就不一定非得连两个句子,非得让后一句补出主语啊?

我隐约的觉得是这样的

10#
发表于 2007-3-9 23:37:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ltw724在2007-3-9 23:24:00的发言:

o ...是不是要成立新的句子就得加逗号

但加了逗号就不一定非得连两个句子,非得让后一句补出主语啊?

我隐约的觉得是这样的

That's it!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 03:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部