885-11-12

caterpillar · 发表于 2004-7-19 08:47:00

请问大家：

after oil reserves are exhausted在这里做什么成份啊？如果作状语修饰主语Alaska, 那好象是说主语deposits some of its profits 这个动作是发生在after oil reserves are exhausted，逻辑意思不通。如果不是作状语，那又是做什么成份呢？after从句可以做定语吗？比如修饰economy?

caterpillar · 发表于 2004-7-19 21:37:00

caterpillar · 发表于 2004-7-20 11:02:00

rt316 · 发表于 2004-7-20 11:11:00

after作状语修饰sustain

caterpillar · 发表于 2004-7-20 11:13:00

谢谢！

可是，我怎么记得分词短语里面是不能套状语从句的，是不是我搞错了？

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-20 11:13:50编辑过]

rt316 · 发表于 2004-7-20 11:29:00

以下是引用caterpillar在2004-7-20 11:13:00的发言：

可是，我怎么记得分词短语里面是不能套状语从句的，是不是我搞错了？

好像没有这种说法，印象中分词套状语的例子还不少。

caterpillar · 发表于 2004-7-20 20:26:00

以下是引用stoneren在2004-7-20 11:29:00的发言：

好像没有这种说法，印象中分词套状语的例子还不少。

多谢,那我再留心总结一下.

gonghao · 发表于 2006-8-6 09:36:00

。。。。

原来介词+ing确实只能修饰逻辑主语

明白了

vivian_huang · 发表于 2007-8-19 23:41:00

以下是引用joywzy在2003-11-5 11:54:00的发言：
miejue,我找到OG 21了.

介词+现在分词,修饰的是主语.不是前面的那个名词.我明确了.

你说的歧义我理解了.谢谢.

现在我不明白了，OG21例子说明的好像是介词+分词结构最好不要放在句中，尽量放在句首或句尾，而OG21中就存在该结构放在句中，结果虽然逻辑上应该修饰前面，结果语法上却修饰了后面，然后造成理解上的逻辑错误：

21. Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy

(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food

(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food

(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of
criminal or delinquent behavior

(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of
criminal or delinquent behavior

In choices A, C, and E, in attributing ... behavior modifies the perpetrators, producing the illogical statement that the perpetrators rather than the defense attorneys are attributing behavior to food allergies. Choice C is also wordy, and attributing ... as is unidiomatic in E. In the correct form of the expression, one
attributes x, an effect, to y, a cause; or, if a passive construction is used, x is attributed to y. D avoids the initial modification error by using a passive construction (in which the attributors are not identified), but attributed x as the cause of y is unidiomatic. Choice B is best.

songlovegt · 发表于 2009-4-14 00:36:00

另外一个状语从句修饰不定式的例子

GWD-29-Q10
The principal feature of the redesigned checks is a
series of printed instructions that the company hopes will help
merchants confirm a check’s authenticity, which includes reminders to watch the endorsement, compare signatures, and view the watermark while holding the check to the light.
A.       which includes reminders to watch the endorsement, compare signatures, and view
B.       which include reminders for watching the endorsement, to compare signatures and view
C.       by including reminders for watching the endorsement, comparing signatures, and viewing
D.       including reminders to watch the endorsement, comparing signatures and viewing
E.       including reminders to watch the endorsement, compare signatures, and view

while 引导的状语从句是和不定式to watch the watermark并列的

including reminders (to merchant) to watch the endorsement, compare
signatures, and view the watermark while holding the check to the light
这样的省略不常见，while不是必须和主句并列，而且逻辑上的主语可以都省

885-11-12

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()