Let analysis the argument:
(Premise)Manufacturers of coffee lighteners based on coconut oil claim that their products usually cause the (conclusion) typical consumer’s blood cholesterol to rise to a lower level than does the use of whole milk as a lighteners.
Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for the manufacturers’ claim? This is a strengthen type of question. It is strengthening the conclusion.
(A) Consumers of lighteners made with coconut oil who avoid other high-cholesterol foods and exercise more than average tend to have lower-than-average blood cholesterol levels. “exercise more” is never mentioned in the argument, we only want to compare the coconut lightener and the diary lightener.
(B) Coffee is frequently consumed with pastries and other rich desserts that themselves result in high blood cholesterol levels. Same reason as A, out of scope.
(C) One popular nondairy coffee lightener that is not based on coconut oil has reduced its fat content by 20 percent while keeping its cholesterol content at zero. The argument is not about nondairy and none coconut based lightener, out of scope.
(D) Consumers typically add to their coffee substantially smaller quantities of coconut-oil-based lighteners than of whole milk. Honestly, I do not like this answer too. It is like choose the least worst apple from a basket of rotten apples
Add smaller quantity of coconut based lightener will strengthen the conclusion that consumer’s blood cholesterol to rise to a lower level.
You have to remember that in this question you are ask to strengthen the argument, any answer that strengthen from 1% to 99% will do it. (E) Most consumers are convinced that whole dairy products increase blood cholesterol and that nondairy coffee lighteners do not.
Totally out of scope |