ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: joywzy
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG189

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2005-9-22 16:28:00 | 只看该作者
i think it is subject of the clause
32#
发表于 2005-11-14 17:51:00 | 只看该作者
是做同位语。
33#
发表于 2005-11-18 14:53:00 | 只看该作者
还是不明白为何ETS认为such purposes as ….. 这个结构比purposes such as…好?有什么区别?
34#
发表于 2006-1-11 00:16:00 | 只看该作者

同问:


A correct sentence must maintain parallel structure. In choice A, the three-part series (to diagnose ...,
deciding,... or other purposes ...) lacks parallelism. C, the best choice, replaces A's third element with/or such
purposes as; this phrase functions as a stem for the other two elements
, which are recast as two parallel
phrases--diagnosing ... or deciding .... Thus, choice C not only manages the parallel structure but avoids the
less effective other purposes such as these at the end of choice A. Choice E uses faulty parallel structure (to
be used..., deciding ..., or the like). In B and D, which and the use of which introduce sentence elements that
lack antecedents or reference. In addition, D is wordy.



og解释中红字的部分什么意思?是说:A中的or other purpose such as these不够简洁,不如such purpose as作为总分结构中的总述好,是吗?

35#
发表于 2006-1-11 09:14:00 | 只看该作者
解释的挺清楚.谢谢!
36#
发表于 2006-1-11 09:26:00 | 只看该作者

不是说"such purposes as ….. "比"purposes such as…"好.而是在A里用"other purposes such as these"没有C来的好.


不能觉对的是说"such purposes as ….. "比"purposes such as…"好.

37#
发表于 2006-10-24 23:29:00 | 只看该作者

弱问一下,如果用as的话,是不是也应该 as an expert can啊? 是不是应该保留助动词?

38#
发表于 2006-10-26 22:19:00 | 只看该作者

弱问一下,如果用as的话,是不是也应该 as an expert can啊? 是不是应该保留助动词?

39#
发表于 2006-10-31 20:09:00 | 只看该作者

11th的紫皮OG解释说: 100. Either the clause, as an expert does, or the prepositional phrase, like an expert, is correct and idiomatic in this sentence. 


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-31 20:15:30编辑过]
40#
发表于 2007-8-31 16:31:00 | 只看该作者
37楼正解!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-4 14:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部