ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 846|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Argument Nirvana

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-12-1 11:11:00 | 只看该作者

Argument Nirvana

From Cracking LSAT

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-1 11:20:57编辑过]

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
沙发
发表于 2006-12-1 19:52:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks a lot, pretty simple and clear to remember~~~
板凳
发表于 2006-12-2 06:10:00 | 只看该作者

thanks.

Just want to add. Be critical, use these rules just as general guideline. 

For example, power score preaches weakening or strengthening are never done on premises. But there have been cases, the credited answers are to weaken/strengthen.

Some quick tips from me.

Treat assumption as must be true, that way you can quickly destroy out of scope answers. The difficult ones usually have two subtle choices. Use negation test then.

For paradox, look for cause. The tricky choices usually have effects of the paradox, since they are consistent with paradox, it's easy to fall for those tricky choices.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-12 00:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部