ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2957|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

为什么不用which means?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-22 10:33:00 | 只看该作者

为什么不用which means?

1.    Not all employment selection mechanisms that have a “disparate effect,” that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to their presence in the relevant labor market, are unlawful.
(A) that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to
(B) which means, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with
(C) which means, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with
(D) that is, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to
(E) that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with
为什么不用which means?
说说为什么选d?

沙发
发表于 2003-10-22 10:47:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
发表于 2003-10-22 11:29:00 | 只看该作者
that is 是插入语, that screen .....定语从句修饰mechanisms , 如果换成 which means, that...变成means 的宾语从句了, 而且, 就算是宾语从句, 中间也不应加逗号呀.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-10-22 12:22:00 | 只看该作者
謝謝啦!gemj兄,可以可以再說說independently of 和independent from的區別?
我還是搞不清
5#
发表于 2003-10-22 14:34:00 | 只看该作者
比较一下 independently of united states 和 independent from England 的区别就很好办啦

说的都是同样的事情
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 11:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部