以下是引用braveMBA在2003-10-26 0:31:00的发言: 我的观点: 1、觉得不是强调句型,而是同位语结构,两个都是同位语。
2、it --- Australia
3、如果是三个东西的并列,我认为一定要加AND了
4、感觉应该理解为the opposite pole to civilization是插入语,这样,没有任何语法问题。
5、最关键的是,从句子意思理解,如果是强调句,则变成“在AUSTRALIA是AUSTRALIA之前,是相对级被认为是......”,这似乎很难受吧?句子之间缺少了连贯。
斗胆说一下我的观点,若把黄色部分去掉,就是强调句,强调被考虑为世界末日的这么一个东西就是ANTIPODES---that was condisered the end of the world was the antipodes it was the antipodes, the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimaginable place that was considered the end of the world. 但是为什么不理解成强调呢,因为that前面没有逗号,这样that仅仅能修饰PLACE 如果是it was the antipodes, the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimaginable place, that was considered the end of the world.就是强调句的(请牛牛指正,我不知道两个同位语短语能不能并列,只知道如果是句子并列的话要加连词) 原句it was the antipodes, the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimaginable place that was considered the end of the world. 我觉得应该这样理解,the opposite pole to civilization是antipodes的同位结构,但是作者觉得还没解释够,于是又来一个同位结构,这个结构修饰前面哪一个(antipodes或者the opposite pole to civilization)都可以,因为既然前面两个都是同位结构了,说的就是一码事。因此我觉得不把它理解成插入语更好些。 插入语的结构应该是:主,插入语,谓 其实我觉得应该凭感觉去做题,分析太多了其实容易混淆 拙见,请指正 |