ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Huangzizeng
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Insead据说培养了很多董事长,是不是真的啊?

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-10-30 01:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Huangzizeng在2006-10-30 1:01:00的发言:

说的有道理, 我要听谁的呢? 哈佛就没有贵族了啊?

我不相信那里人人都是白手起家.欧洲的王室贵族也没有那么多的啊, 现在欧洲没有几个王了. 不要说贵族了.

呵呵,说句LZ可能不爱听的话,现在来比较哈佛和INSEAD哪个是老大,是不是多余呢,到底是选哈佛还是INSEAD,似乎是被这两个学校同时录取以后才该考虑的问题

另外,哈佛是清教徒建立的学校,本就是贵族学校啊,算起来,哈佛不只是美国最好的学校,也是最贵族的学校吧


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-30 1:14:45编辑过]
12#
发表于 2006-10-30 07:23:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用强风在2006-10-30 1:11:00的发言:

呵呵,说句LZ可能不爱听的话,现在来比较哈佛和INSEAD哪个是老大,是不是多余呢,到底是选哈佛还是INSEAD,似乎是被这两个学校同时录取以后才该考虑的问题

另外,哈佛是清教徒建立的学校,本就是贵族学校啊,算起来,哈佛不只是美国最好的学校,也是最贵族的学校吧


Agree....

Personally, i rank INSEAD around 6 to 10 of the world.

13#
发表于 2006-10-30 07:28:00 | 只看该作者

And, there is something more to add here.

In PE/VC, Insead is one of the best. At least the best in EU, better than LBS, I would say.

That said, I've never heard of any Chinese graduates from any of the top B-schools in EU landed a job in PE/VC right after graduation.

If there is, please let me know *_*

14#
发表于 2006-10-30 11:15:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Huangzizeng在2006-10-30 1:01:00的发言:

说的有道理, 我要听谁的呢? 哈佛就没有贵族了啊?

我不相信那里人人都是白手起家.欧洲的王室贵族也没有那么多的啊, 现在欧洲没有几个王了. 不要说贵族了.

首先贵族比王多得多,不能因为王不多了就说贵族少了。其次贵族之外还有家族,欧洲的显贵比美国要多不少。

15#
发表于 2006-10-30 13:15:00 | 只看该作者
There are several lbs graduate from mainland China joined PE/VC this year and last year in London, HK or mainland China. Of course not top tier PE (e.g. KKR, Blackstone). I think KKR almost never recruit directly from business school
16#
发表于 2006-10-30 15:27:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kevinao在2006-10-30 13:15:00的发言:
There are several lbs graduate from mainland China joined PE/VC this year and last year in London, HK or mainland China. Of course not top tier PE (e.g. KKR, Blackstone). I think KKR almost never recruit directly from business school

Hi Kevin,

Good to hear that *_* indeed.

Quick question:

Which way do you think is better to get into PE? IB or MC?

17#
发表于 2006-10-30 16:38:00 | 只看该作者

what i heard is: background to PE: PE experience, LBO/IBD/equity research experience, strategic consulting (mainly top 5, not general MC),big 4 transaction services, or specific industry background. 

What I heard is some PE firm recruited some associates from big 4 in China but the pay is very low, even CNY20-30K/month sometimes. A friend in Mckinsey China corporate finance team joined a start-up PE in HK while another friend in BCG told me that several of his colleagues joined tier 1/2 PE (analyst position pay around CNY500-700K without global MBA). I also have friends joined PE firm utilizing their specific industrial background (e.g. chemical/oil gas).  

18#
发表于 2006-10-30 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

While currently i'm aiming at top MC (off course MBA first), PE might be the next move in 10 years time.

Who knows.........

Thanks any way.

All the best.

19#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-31 02:51:00 | 只看该作者
大家可以不可以就问题讨论?
20#
发表于 2006-11-2 02:52:00 | 只看该作者
也就Wharton能和Insead比比,哈佛毕竟是综合性大学
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 18:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部